[THIN] Re: processes stuck from non-logged in user

I'm always slightly disappointed by this explanation for some reason - the
"Napoleonic tendencies" suggestion seems so much *more* acceptable for some
reason ;)

 

 

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Rick Mack
Sent: 21 June 2007 23:25
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: processes stuck from non-logged in user

 

Hi Steve,

 

I work for a company called Commander Australia, www.commander.com. It's
about the fifth name change for the group I've been working for 'cause we
keep being acquired by someone bigger. 

 

I hope that brings some relief to you and the other thinlisters that I don't
have Napoleonic tendencies ;-)

 

regards,

 

Rick

 

Ulrich Mack

www.commander.com ;-)



 

On 6/22/07, Steve Greenberg <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

Rick- what is Commander Australia?

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85262

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net  <http://www.thinclient.net/> 

steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  <mailto:steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Other related posts: