[THIN] Re: if you could only choose one...
- From: Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:32:11 -0500
or use XenApp to virtualize your apps which runs just fine on 64Bit gear and
is included in the priced of licensing XenApp already. Why spend for
features you already paid for.
Greg
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Andrew <andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> App-v; separating apps out and creating a transportable app deployment
> across devices (servers/desktops/laptops) is of greater benefit than 2008r2;
> and I can migrate to that when appv goes 64bit
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 19 Aug 2009, at 17:09, "Wilson, Christopher" <CMWilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Windows 2008 R2 is 64-bit only. App-V is 32-bit only (presently). If
> you had to pick one which would it be – 64-bit arch or app virtualization?
> (and why?)
>
>
>
> 64bit means more memory and more users per server, but possibly some
> compatibility issues
>
> App-V means less app conflicts and hence less silos, but 32 bit only.
>
>
>
> I’m planning for a Citrix farm upgrade and curious about your thoughts.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
