[THIN] Re: if you could only choose one...
- From: Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:02:18 -0500
Are you wanting to virtualize servers or apps?
I would always go with 64bit servers for Citrix where you can. Most apps are
still 32bit anyway.
Greg
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Wilson, Christopher <
CMWilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I said “pick one” J
>
>
>
> Honestly I’ve had pretty lackluster results with virtualizing Citrix
> servers. Not too excited on that prospect presently.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Nick Smith
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:16 AM
> *To:* 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: if you could only choose one...
>
>
>
> 32-bits VMs and App-V. Gives you both, in effect.
>
>
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Wilson, Christopher
> *Sent:* 19 August 2009 17:09
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] if you could only choose one...
>
>
>
> Windows 2008 R2 is 64-bit only. App-V is 32-bit only (presently). If you
> had to pick one which would it be – 64-bit arch or app virtualization? (and
> why?)
>
>
>
> 64bit means more memory and more users per server, but possibly some
> compatibility issues
>
> App-V means less app conflicts and hence less silos, but 32 bit only.
>
>
>
> I’m planning for a Citrix farm upgrade and curious about your thoughts.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> SUBJECT TO CONTRACT
>
Other related posts:
