[THIN] Re: biggest Citrix farm

Barry

I was just a bit puzzled with the strange disconnection comment?

And the comments about the load simulation monitoring on the other
ancillary machines does sound most interesting. I think it's just a
shame, that mainly, I would guess most companies won't find / justify
the money for it.

Neil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Barry Flanagan
> Sent: 27 February 2004 15:17
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: biggest Citrix farm
> 
> Neil,
> 
> Of course, You are right. MI is difficult to cost justify for 
> small farms. I mentioned it becasue we were discussing very 
> large farms. Though load simulation is important in any size 
> farm, IMO. There are some lower cost options. Scapa works a 
> bit differently than MI, but I hear it is very functional and 
> much cheaper (though I have never used it and haven't heard 
> much about them lately). CitraTest has lot of fans as well, 
> mainly because they are not expensive. The CSTK of course has 
> it uses, but it main limitation is all the scripts run on the 
> server, not on the client. This can help with server sizing, 
> but does not simulate the entire solution and may not give 
> you a good idea on user response time. Being free is the 
> trade off however <g>.
> 
> Another advantage MI has is you can use it to monitor other 
> systems involved in the solution, and therefore determine if 
> another component is the bottleneck. You can have MI 
> components on your SQL datastore, your Exchange Server, DC's, 
> and files servers for example, and be able to correlate a 
> major increase in response time to a CPU spike on a file 
> server or Exchange server.  For full disclosure, I do NOT own 
> stock in MI (in case you are starting to wonder), but I am 
> sold on load simulation. 
> 
> You are right in your assumption on Fr3. The improvements in 
> IMA are not specifically a feature and are part of the SP. I 
> guess I should have just used SP3, instead of FR3.
> 
> BTW, your strange disconnection story was read with great 
> interest by many of my co-workers around the world (I 
> forwarded it, hope you don't mind). Thanx for sharing!

***********************************************
This e-mail and its attachments are confidential
and are intended for the above named recipient
only. If this has come to you in error, please 
notify the sender immediately and delete this 
e-mail from your system.
You must take no action based on this, nor must 
you copy or disclose it or any part of its contents 
to any person or organisation.
Statements and opinions contained in this email may 
not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods.
Please note that e-mail communications may be monitored.
The registered office of Littlewoods Limited and its
subsidiaries is 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB.
Registered number of Littlewoods Limited is 262152.
************************************************

********************************************************
This weeks sponsor triCerat Inc.
triCerat makes your job easier by offering essential
applications to eliminate your printing, policy and profile,
and your application management problems.
http://www.triCerat.com 
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm

Other related posts: