[THIN] Re: biggest Citrix farm
- From: "Schill, Mark" <Mark.Schill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:29:32 -0600
BellSouth has an enterprise agreement with MI. Unfortunately Citrix
vusers were not part of the agreement and we had to pay $75,000 for 500
users.
Mark E. Schill, CCA
BellSouth Technology Group
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Barry Flanagan
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 11:09 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: biggest Citrix farm
Neil,
Got my wires crossed for a moment there on the disconnection story.
Stupid American, huh?=20
I should cut down on the coffee I guess. <g>
I think you can cost justify it for larger solutions. Many large
companies already use MI to load simulate their external web servers
and e-commerce. The most expensive part is the Load Runner Console
usually.=20
One nice option MI has is the ability for partners to essentially
rent their software for Consulting engagements. They had this a year
or so ago when I first met with them, I assume it is still available.
They do require some training and certification on the partners
part.I don't know how much the publicize this option, but I know they
have offered it in the past. May be something to consider for the
Consultants and resellers on the list.
Thanx,
Barry Flanagan=20
=20
--- "Braebaum, Neil" <Neil.Braebaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Barry
>=20
> I was just a bit puzzled with the strange disconnection comment?
>=20
> And the comments about the load simulation monitoring on the other
> ancillary machines does sound most interesting. I think it's just a
> shame, that mainly, I would guess most companies won't find /
> justify
> the money for it.
>=20
> Neil
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Barry Flanagan
> > Sent: 27 February 2004 15:17
> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: biggest Citrix farm
> >=20
> > Neil,
> >=20
> > Of course, You are right. MI is difficult to cost justify for=20
> > small farms. I mentioned it becasue we were discussing very=20
> > large farms. Though load simulation is important in any size=20
> > farm, IMO. There are some lower cost options. Scapa works a=20
> > bit differently than MI, but I hear it is very functional and=20
> > much cheaper (though I have never used it and haven't heard=20
> > much about them lately). CitraTest has lot of fans as well,=20
> > mainly because they are not expensive. The CSTK of course has=20
> > it uses, but it main limitation is all the scripts run on the=20
> > server, not on the client. This can help with server sizing,=20
> > but does not simulate the entire solution and may not give=20
> > you a good idea on user response time. Being free is the=20
> > trade off however <g>.
> >=20
> > Another advantage MI has is you can use it to monitor other=20
> > systems involved in the solution, and therefore determine if=20
> > another component is the bottleneck. You can have MI=20
> > components on your SQL datastore, your Exchange Server, DC's,=20
> > and files servers for example, and be able to correlate a=20
> > major increase in response time to a CPU spike on a file=20
> > server or Exchange server. For full disclosure, I do NOT own=20
> > stock in MI (in case you are starting to wonder), but I am=20
> > sold on load simulation.=20
> >=20
> > You are right in your assumption on Fr3. The improvements in=20
> > IMA are not specifically a feature and are part of the SP. I=20
> > guess I should have just used SP3, instead of FR3.
> >=20
> > BTW, your strange disconnection story was read with great=20
> > interest by many of my co-workers around the world (I=20
> > forwarded it, hope you don't mind). Thanx for sharing!
>=20
> ***********************************************
> This e-mail and its attachments are confidential
> and are intended for the above named recipient
> only. If this has come to you in error, please=20
> notify the sender immediately and delete this=20
> e-mail from your system.
> You must take no action based on this, nor must=20
> you copy or disclose it or any part of its contents=20
> to any person or organisation.
> Statements and opinions contained in this email may=20
> not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods.
> Please note that e-mail communications may be monitored.
> The registered office of Littlewoods Limited and its
> subsidiaries is 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB.
> Registered number of Littlewoods Limited is 262152.
> ************************************************
>=20
> ********************************************************
> This weeks sponsor triCerat Inc.
> triCerat makes your job easier by offering essential
> applications to eliminate your printing, policy and profile,
> and your application management problems.
> http://www.triCerat.com=20
> **********************************************************
> Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> http://thin.net/links.cfm
> ***********************************************************
> For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or=20
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
********************************************************
This weeks sponsor triCerat Inc.
triCerat makes your job easier by offering essential
applications to eliminate your printing, policy and profile,
and your application management problems.
http://www.triCerat.com=20
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or=20
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
*****
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity =
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, =
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination =
or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this =
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is =
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender =
and delete the material from all computers." 113
********************************************************
This weeks sponsor triCerat Inc.
triCerat makes your job easier by offering essential
applications to eliminate your printing, policy and profile,
and your application management problems.
http://www.triCerat.com
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts: