[THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- From: Jeremy Saunders <jeremy.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:45:08 +0800
Some interesting stuff from some design research we've been doing...
Why DNS Based Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) Doesn't Work
http://www.tenereillo.com/GSLBPageOfShame.htm
http://www.tenereillo.com/GSLBPageOfShameII.htm
http://www.tenereillo.com/BrowserDNSCache.htm
This stuff is pretty full on, and very well written.
It would be interesting to get the view of a NetScaler Engineer on this.
Cheers.
Kind regards,
Jeremy Saunders
Senior Technical Specialist
Infrastructure Technology Services
(ITS) & Cerulean
Global Technology Services (GTS)
IBM Australia
Level 2, 1060 Hay Street
West Perth WA 6005
Visit us at
http://www.ibm.com/services/au/its
P: +61 8 9261 8412 F: +61 8 9261 8486
M: TBA E-mail:
jeremy.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Steve Greenberg"
<steveg@thinclien
t.net> To
Sent by: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thin-bounce@freel cc
ists.org
Subject
[THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
23/05/2006 10:44
PM
Please respond to
thin
Does this avoid the original issues? Nothing else should be required on the
WI. Where is your Netscaler placed on the network? (DMZ, LAN, same segment
as WI, etc.)
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
www.thinclient.net
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of BRUTON, Malcolm, GBM
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 1:32 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
Hi Steve
We are doing what you suggest already. Found the persistent session
timeout on Netscaler was ten minutes. We have now set this to the same
length (720) of time as set in the web.config on the WI server. I assume
no tweaks are needed on the WI servers? PS this is WI3 with XPe FR3
Malcolm
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: 18 May 2006 13:45
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
A persistent session with a cookie insert should do the trick, double
check that the client is not blocking cookies!
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
www.thinclient.net
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of BRUTON, Malcolm, GBM
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:04 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
That would be great. I'm sure it's the netscaler piece that is not
quite right....You didn't make any changes to WI to help?
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: 17 May 2006 16:45
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
That should work right. I happen to be working with a Netscaler
engineer today, I will see if I can learn more for you
Regards,
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
www.thinclient.net
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of BRUTON,
Malcolm, GBM
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:41 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
I believe so. Think we are using a Cookie.
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve
Greenberg
Sent: 17 May 2006 16:08
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
Are the sessions persistent? If so, what is the
persistence based on?
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
www.thinclient.net
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of BRUTON,
Malcolm, GBM
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:32 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] WI and Netscaler's
Hi All
Anyone have some pointers for getting WI to work well
with netscalers. Essentially we have two WI 3 servers
and two Netscalers and load balance. Having some issues
where WI seems to go into a loop and not display apps.
Also does not always display icons and sometimes straight
after logging in says the session has expired. If you
close the IE session and go back in it works correctly.
Also if you go to both the WI server directly without
going via Netscalers it works correctly.
Tips and hints to look at ?
Malcolm
***********************************************************************************
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No
90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh
EH2 2YB.
Authorized and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the
addressee only. If the message is received by anyone
other
than the addressee, please return the message to the
sender
by replying to it and then delete the message from your
computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure.
The
Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility
for
changes made to this message after it was sent.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the
transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the
recipient to
ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of
this
message and any attachments will not adversely affect its
systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The
Royal
Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and
the recipient shou
ld
carry
out such virus and other checks as it considers
appropriate.
Visit our websites at:
http://www.rbos.com
http://www.rbsmarkets.com
***********************************************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- From: Steve Greenberg
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] WI and Netscaler's
- » [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- » [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- » [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- » [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- » [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- » [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- » [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- » [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- » [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- [THIN] Re: WI and Netscaler's
- From: Steve Greenberg