[THIN] Re: W2K Terminal Server and IIS
- From: "Paul DeHaan" <wppad@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 17:02:00 -0400
There is no question that it works, I've tested it (Win2k, IIS 5, MF
XP). Like Jim said, it's not a good security practice, plus that's a
whole lot of cookies in one basket. You would also really have to test
performance before rolling it out, since these services are all pretty
beefy.
I have thought about creating a server like this for a few real
special, low usage apps, simply because of cost. Up to now I've stayed
away.
Paul
>>> jimkenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 07/08/02 03:51PM >>>
I'm not sure if there is one. It is just plain good security practice
to
have the least amount of services installed on a server as possible.
Also
IIS does consume a lot of resources that are needed for users. I think
that
Rick D's tips document http://www.tweakcitrix.com also reccomends to
not run
IIS on the WTS.
Personally I'd never do it but I do know of comapanies that do.
Regards,
Jim Kenzig
http://thethin.net
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Roberto Casagrande
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:23 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] W2K Terminal Server and IIS
Does anyone have a document or a link to information clearly explaining
the
problems with and reasons for not having IIS on a Terminal Server?
===================================
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
===================================
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts:
