[THIN] Re: [THIN]

  • From: <Roberto.Casagrande@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:29:50 -0500

Thanks for all the information.
 
 
Roberto Casagrande 
613-951-1373 | facsimile / télécopieur 613-951-3129 
Roberto.Casagrande@xxxxxxxxxx 
Statistics Canada | 120 Parkdale Avenue Ottawa ON K1A 0T6 
Statistique Canada | 120 avenue Parkdale Ottawa ON K1A 0T6 
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada 


        -----Original Message-----
        From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com
        Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:51 AM
        To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [THIN] Re: [THIN]
        
        
        ESX 2.5 has a workload setting for Citrix/TS that should be set when 
creating the machine that helps. See how to set up the virtual machine properly 
for this at:
        http://www.vmware.com/support/esx25/doc/admin/esx25admin_newvm_vms.html
         
        Did you do it that way?.
         
        and here is another one on tweaking...
        
http://www.vmware.com/support/esx25/doc/admin/esx25admin_improveperf.html
        
        Jim

        ----- Original Message ----
        From: Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>
        To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:40:16 AM
        Subject: [THIN] Re: [THIN]
        
        
        Terminal services is not a good match with VMWare at this time.  You 
won't get near the response times as being on direct hardware.
         
        Jeff Pitsch
        Microsoft MVP- Terminal Services
        
         
        On 1/5/06, Roberto.Casagrande@xxxxxxxxxx <Roberto.Casagrande@xxxxxxxxxx 
> wrote: 

                Does anyone has any information in relation to tweaking a 
Terminal
                Server OS in order to work as efficiently as possible on a 
VMWARE ESX 
                v2.5 box?
                
                We are finding that response times for our clients applications 
are
                coming up significantly slower than with a standalone 
configuration of
                the same box.  Any advice would be appreciated.

Other related posts: