[THIN] Re: [THIN]
- From: Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:52:26 -0500
But you have to admit that they will get less response and less users on a
VM than by going direct to hardware. Unless these are lightly used TS
boxes, VMWare is just not a good fit.
Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP- Terminal Services
On 1/5/06, Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ESX 2.5 has a workload setting for Citrix/TS that should be set when
> creating the machine that helps. See how to set up the virtual machine
> properly for this at:
> http://www.vmware.com/support/esx25/doc/admin/esx25admin_newvm_vms.html
>
> Did you do it that way?.
>
> and here is another one on tweaking...
> http://www.vmware.com/support/esx25/doc/admin/esx25admin_improveperf.html
>
> Jim
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:40:16 AM
> Subject: [THIN] Re: [THIN]
>
> Terminal services is not a good match with VMWare at this time. You won't
> get near the response times as being on direct hardware.
>
> Jeff Pitsch
> Microsoft MVP- Terminal Services
>
>
> On 1/5/06, Roberto.Casagrande@xxxxxxxxxx <Roberto.Casagrande@xxxxxxxxxx >
> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone has any information in relation to tweaking a Terminal
> > Server OS in order to work as efficiently as possible on a VMWARE ESX
> > v2.5 box?
> >
> > We are finding that response times for our clients applications are
> > coming up significantly slower than with a standalone configuration of
> > the same box. Any advice would be appreciated.
>
>
Other related posts:
