> -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joel Stolk > Sent: 29 June 2004 17:10 > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: Simply Profiles / Hybrid Profiles > > Wow. Quite. > Neil, I just wanted to know if you had any real world > experience to contribute Plenty. Do I use flex profiles in production - already answered. > so I could reevaluate flex profiles > and maybe learn something. You already have. That which you said they couldn't do, you now know that they can. And that bit where you said they were not flexible (or flexible enough) you now know differently. No sense in keep bleating to me about it - those are the *facts*. > I am not trying to challenge your > knowledge or experience. You seem to know a lot about what > you're talking about. I'm not sure where your inner turmoil > is coming from, but please leave me out of it. I don't have any "inner turmoil". If you sense any annoyance, it's likely because of your repeated bickering and challenging over this, which at least *appears* to be because I refuted your absolute claims about what flex profiles could deal with; and you making bogus claims about the flexibility of the flex profile kit - which after examination were shown to be wrong. Now if you want to keep bickering over the subject, then feel free... But as to your claims of them being inflexible - you're just plain wrong - sometimes there's no nice way of saying that. And as to your claims of them not being able to deal with files and folders - well guess what - you're wrong about that to. Maybe that gives you some ground to re-evaluate your current thinking on the subject, and maybe not - that's up to you. No sense keep bickering against what I've contributed on the subject, just because it doesn't suit. As to this issue of performance that's going to be the case whether you use roaming profiles, or use flex profiles to simply provide user personalisation of certain parts of the profile folder structure. Of course folder redirection is usually a better prospect - because it is exactly that - redirection. When it's too general, or doesn't provide the granularity, or can't cope with bespoke folders - then flex profiles can. Other than that - end of. Neil *********************************************** This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and are intended for the above named recipient only. If this has come to you in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail from your system. You must take no action based on this, nor must you copy or disclose it or any part of its contents to any person or organisation. Statements and opinions contained in this email may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods. Please note that e-mail communications may be monitored. The registered office of Littlewoods Limited and its subsidiaries is 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB. Registered number of Littlewoods Limited is 262152. ************************************************ ******************************************************** This weeks sponsor Emergent Online Thinssentials Utilities Using the latest software, hardware, networking technologies, proven technical expertise, proprietary software and best practices, EOL provides custom-tailored solutions for each client?s mission and specific goals. http://www.go-eol.com ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm