[THIN] Re: Short question (Streched Cluster Support in W2K3 Enterprise Edition ?)
- From: "Daniel Schoppmann" <dschoppmann@xxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:03:31 +0200
Thank U, Ron, Jon and Chris for your discussion so far
The guys from Veritas also introduced to us the Replica Solution.
But we have a dark fibre (2GBit) between our Datacenters and SAN is
available in both places.
So isn't it better to build a mirror with the Veritas Volume Manager.
Of Course their told us about some Problems that might occour, that are ony
solved in the new Veritas Cluster Server 4.1
Has anyone used or using a streched Veritas Cluster ? What are
recommendations ?
Seems to me that Replica Solution is best when you doesn't have a fast
connection between the two Data Centers, isn't it?
Ciao, Daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Ron Oglesby
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 4:34 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Short question (Streched Cluster Support in W2K3
Enterprise Edition ?)
SAN replication has come so far (not to mention the snapping, rollback
abilities, Specific application snapping etc.) that it is almost a shame NOT
to replicate data.
Ron Oglesby
Senior Technical Architect
Microsoft MVP - Windows Server
RapidApp, Chicago
Mobile 815 325-7618
Office 312 372-7188
e-mail roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Rowlandson, John
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 6:01 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Short question (Streched Cluster Support in W2K3
Enterprise Edition ?)
Mallesons Stephen Jaques
www.mallesons.com
Confidential communication
thats exactly what we do cluster in primary, cluster in DR, replicated =
data
John (san administrator hat on!)
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On =
Behalf
That is very true. It's not really recommended, but you have the =
option.
It would be a much better solution to have a SAN or NAS in two =
locations,
have two nodes per cluster and replicate the data between the shared
storage. That would give you full redundancy (service level, and site =
level
for DR).
Chris=20
********************************************************
This week's sponsor - Neoware Thin Clients
Neoware makes computing open, secure, reliable,
affordable, manageable and obsolete-free.
Starting at $199!
http://www.neoware.com
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
********************************************************
This week's sponsor - Neoware Thin Clients
Neoware makes computing open, secure, reliable,
affordable, manageable and obsolete-free.
Starting at $199!
http://www.neoware.com
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
********************************************************
This week's sponsor - Neoware Thin Clients
Neoware makes computing open, secure, reliable,
affordable, manageable and obsolete-free.
Starting at $199!
http://www.neoware.com
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts:
