[THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- From: "cherie.watts Watts" <cherie.watts@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:49:58 +0100
The default site is already in use...and I want to secure the web interface
site as well.
Can't change the existing sites....and I think if you can have multiple Web
Interface sites, then it doesn't make sense that CSG can't be configure for
a specific one.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Russell Robertson <
russell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That's understandable, why don't you make sure that CSG/WI is the default
> site and create virtual sites with host headers for the rest?
>
>
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *cherie.watts Watts
> *Sent:* 26 June 2008 15:54
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
>
>
>
> I want to use an existing Web server. We only have about 5 people who use
> Secure Gateway. So load won't be an issue and dedicating a server for this
> is a total waste of resources.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Russell Robertson <
> russell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Cherie
>
>
>
> You have to be careful with SSL and using host headers if hosting more than
> one site on IIS. I think functionality for this in IIS 6.0 works but
> haven't tried it. We tend to recommend using a single server for CSG/WI.
>
>
>
> Why do you want to avoid using the Default site?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Russell
>
> *Russell Robertson* | Virtual Stream | www.virtualstream.co.uk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *cherie.watts Watts
> *Sent:* 26 June 2008 12:46
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone
>
>
>
> I have just about driven myself crazy trying to configure these.
>
>
>
> I have no problems connecting with Secure Gateway if Web Interface is
> installed into the Default website on the IIS server. But if I create it in
> a new website in IIS and set Web Interface site etc... This all works from
> the Web Interface links. But Secure Gateway persists in opening the
> iistart.htm in the default website.
>
>
>
> I am not sure if it is a config problem in Web Interface or Secure
> Gateway..
>
>
>
> What am I doing wrong or not doing?? Please help
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Cherie
>
>
>
- References:
- [THIN] Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- From: cherie.watts Watts
- [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- From: Russell Robertson
- [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- From: cherie.watts Watts
- [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- From: Russell Robertson
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- » [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- » [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- » [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- » [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- » [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- » [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- [THIN] Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- From: cherie.watts Watts
- [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- From: Russell Robertson
- [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- From: cherie.watts Watts
- [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question
- From: Russell Robertson