[THIN] Re: Script question
- From: "Webster" <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:25:33 -0600
And I think RichCopy is better than Robocopy. J http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2009.04.utilityspotlight.aspx?pr =blog Webster From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig Subject: [THIN] Re: Script question And I think Robocopy is better than Xcopy.... Jim Kenzig http://www.kenzig.com On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Agreed. xcopy is better and also the start command should have a Title specified (as you also corrected). Even if it is "".
- References:
- [THIN] Re: Script question
- From: Webster
- [THIN] Re: Script question
- From: Hamilton, Ronnie
- [THIN] Re: Script question
- From: Jeremy Saunders
- [THIN] Re: Script question
- From: Joe Shonk
- [THIN] Re: Script question
- From: Jim Kenzig
- [THIN] Re: Script question
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] Script question - Hamilton, Ronnie
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Andrew Wood
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Hamilton, Ronnie
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Anthony_Baldwin
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Webster
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Hamilton, Ronnie
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Jeremy Saunders
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Joe Shonk
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Hamilton, Ronnie
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Jay Moock
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Joe Shonk
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Jim Kenzig
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Hamilton, Ronnie
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Goudreault.Louis
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Webster
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Jim Kenzig
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Hamilton, Ronnie
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Andrew
- » [THIN] Re: Script question - Warren Simondson