[THIN] Re: Satellite Access
- From: "Jim Kenzig Kenzig.com" <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 07:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Satellite yes I agree to an extent..wireless I'd have to say no.
Jim
Jeff Pitsch <com> wrote:
I think the example is a little extreme, but Metaframe can only handle
so much latency. I standby what I say for satellite. Unless they've
improved the services, in the last year, Metaframe, typically, does
not work.
Jeff Pitsch
On 5/2/05, Jim Kenzig Kenzig.com wrote:
> Thats pretty absurd. You can adjust Citrix or TS for latency just fine.
> JK
>
> Ron Jameson wrote:
> Yes - latency is unbearable on this type setup...we even found WiFi
> wireless in our coverage areas as well has enough latency to cause
> problems. We make a point to say no wire, no VPN or Terminal Services.
>
> Ron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 8:56 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Satellite Access
>
> Latency is the killer with satelite. It's usually extremely high and
> makes most things like metaframe unusable.
>
> Jeff Pitsch
Other related posts:
