[THIN] Re: SSL
- From: "Andrew Wood" <andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:21:12 -0000
In which case - configure it for SSL Relay.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Bijumon Chacko
Sent: 31 October 2005 17:07
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: SSL
Hii
The main idea was to reduce hardware..
It seems, we cant install Pres server, WI and CSG on same box..
----- Original Message -----
From: Kaftan, John <mailto:jkaftan@xxxxxxx>
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 9:30 PM
Subject: [THIN] Re: SSL
I have to ask why would what to do this? CSG is pretty slick. It doesn't
cost anything, and all traffic is encrypted with minimal exposure to your
LAN. Hardware wise you can run it on your WI box and you don't need much in
the way of resources.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Andrew Wood
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 1:36 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: SSL
Enabling https will secure the traffic to the citrix xml service. Enabling
SSL relay will secure all traffic to the citrix server
You don't need to setup SSL Relay to enable https for your XML service.
Https for xml needs IIS to be installed and shared with XML service.
Whichever one you use you will need a server certificate on each of the
citrix servers you want to secure, and the root certificate for your private
CA installed on each of your clients.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Bijumon Chacko
Sent: 29 August 2005 15:53
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] SSL
Hii friends..
Im thinking of setting up SSL (without CSG) using a private CA.
The HTTPS communication workins fine between WI and client.
But i am loosing track on secure connectioin to the MF server.
Should I use HTTPS orCitrix SSL RElay.
Both cases, do i have to setupSSL relay on MFXP configuration
thanx
B
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: SSL
- From: Bijumon Chacko
- References:
- [THIN] Re: SSL
- From: Bijumon Chacko
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] SSL
- » [THIN] SSL
- » [THIN] Re: SSL
- » [THIN] Re: SSL
- » [THIN] Re: SSL
- » [THIN] Re: SSL
- » [THIN] Re: SSL
- » [THIN] Re: SSL
- » [THIN] Re: SSL
- [THIN] Re: SSL
- From: Bijumon Chacko
- [THIN] Re: SSL
- From: Bijumon Chacko