[THIN] Re: *SPOOFED SENDER* Re: Anyone using Application virtualization inside a Citrix/TS session?

  • From: "Mason, Aaron" <Aaron.Mason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:01:14 -0500

And kudos to boot!! :)


-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Layman, Eric
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:13 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: *SPOOFED SENDER* [THIN] Re: Anyone using Application
virtualization inside a Citrix/TS session?

http://www.virtuall.nl/articles/applicationanddesktopdelivery/Applicatio
nVirtualizationSolutionsOverviewandFeatureMatrix.pdf

Ruben Spruijt (PQR) has provided an excellent document to help you
compare your requirements to the prominent vendor solutions.  Note that
Altiris SVS is not supported on Terminal Server...

We use App-V 4.1 currently, but there is a learning curve.  Not 64-bit
capable yet, and our core apps are installed locally.

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Matt Kosht
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 2:45 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Anyone using Application virtualization inside a
Citrix/TS session?

I heard the OLE thing mostly was addressed in v4.5.  I will definitely
be testing those kinds of apps though.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Nick Smith <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I use Softgrid (4.0, which I know is a version behind). It is useful
for some minor/weird apps, but as soon as you use an app with OLE-type
integration, it falls apart - and that wipes out Office, Accounts
packages, CRM, most databases...sequencing most apps sounds lovely (And
got me very excited as a possibility) but definitely is not feasible -
though, again, I've just stayed at 4.0. I'm sure others will chip in
with more recent experience...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Matt Kosht
> Sent: 06 February 2009 19:09
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Anyone using Application virtualization inside a
Citrix/TS session?
>
> Looking to test this for our Citrix farm in the near future. My
> objective is to sequence most apps we use on our farm to make the
> actual Citrix server nothing more than an OS and place for the
> virtualized apps to run.  What do you use? Why did you choose/stick
> with this product?  I know Citrix has their own app streaming in
> XA5.0, but don't you have to run Enterprise or Platinum editions to
> get this functionality?  Anyone use App-V for Terminal Services? Is
> this better/worse solution than Citrix? Other products I should try
> evaluating that do this would also be welcome.
> -Matt
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> Follow ThinList on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/thinlist
> Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
> http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
> Thinlist MOBILE Feed
> http://thinlist.net/mobile
> ************************************************
>
> SUBJECT TO CONTRACT
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> Follow ThinList on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/thinlist
> Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
> http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
> Thinlist MOBILE Feed
> http://thinlist.net/mobile
> ************************************************
>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************


------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
***National City made the following annotations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
This communication is a confidential and proprietary business
communication.  
It is intended solely for the use of the designated recipient(s).  If
this
communication is received in error, please contact the sender and delete

this communication.
========================================================================
===================
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************


************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************

Other related posts:

  • » [THIN] Re: *SPOOFED SENDER* Re: Anyone using Application virtualization inside a Citrix/TS session? - Mason, Aaron