[THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- From: "Trevor Fuson" <fuson@xxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:57:29 -0700
I would recommend looking at the Chip-PC thin clients because they have
the best software feature set and management software (Excalibur). We
currently use Wyse units but Rapport sucks, I wouldn't recommend them
for this reason.
Personally I think Windows CE is the best since it doesn't need to be
patched, if you want Windows XP I think going with a desktop is a better
choice.
The only issue I have with Linux devices is the slow boot speed and the
feature set isn't better that a good CE device.
I would recommend looking at the dual screen models since you can get up
to a 30% productivity increase by deploying dual screens to task based
workers.
Trevor.
SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
- References:
- [THIN] Recommendations for Thin client devices
- From: Matt Kosht
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- [THIN] Recommendations for Thin client devices
- From: Matt Kosht