[THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- From: "Ron Vaughn" <ron.vaughn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:46:42 -0600
We use the Wyse v-90's w/xpe they have worked great for us in terminal
services. Make sure you get enough ram (min 512, ideally 1gb) and you
should be good to go.
On 3/27/07, Matt Kosht <matt.kosht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Although I have been using Citrix (1.8 Metaframe to PS 4.0) and MS
Terminal services (NT 4.0 TSE to Win2k3 R2) for about 7-8 yrs now,
I have only used them in conjunction with "real" PC's. Seeing on the
horizon yet another painful desktop OS upgrade to Vista, I see a
chance to perhaps get off the hamster wheel.
I would like to test a small (initially 2-3 then up to 25 clients)
pilot of these devices. My only exposure to these was a lone Wyse
3360SE (Windows CE 3.0 I think) device many years ago. At that time I
found it slow and limited (graphics resolution) but usable. I don't
think they would ever replace all the PC's (laptops and GIS editing
stations in particular) in my case, but the vast majority of users use
MS Office, E-mail (groupwise) and a handful of apps (most already
available as published applications on our Citrix farm).
I would be interested in hearing real world opinions of likes/dislikes
in these devices. Be sure to include:
_Make/Model
_OS (CE, XPe, Linux, others?) Do you find one of these superior to another? Why?
Thanks in advance.
-Matt
SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [THIN] Recommendations for Thin client devices
- From: Matt Kosht
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
- » [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
Although I have been using Citrix (1.8 Metaframe to PS 4.0) and MS Terminal services (NT 4.0 TSE to Win2k3 R2) for about 7-8 yrs now, I have only used them in conjunction with "real" PC's. Seeing on the horizon yet another painful desktop OS upgrade to Vista, I see a chance to perhaps get off the hamster wheel. I would like to test a small (initially 2-3 then up to 25 clients) pilot of these devices. My only exposure to these was a lone Wyse 3360SE (Windows CE 3.0 I think) device many years ago. At that time I found it slow and limited (graphics resolution) but usable. I don't think they would ever replace all the PC's (laptops and GIS editing stations in particular) in my case, but the vast majority of users use MS Office, E-mail (groupwise) and a handful of apps (most already available as published applications on our Citrix farm). I would be interested in hearing real world opinions of likes/dislikes in these devices. Be sure to include: _Make/Model _OS (CE, XPe, Linux, others?) Do you find one of these superior to another? Why? Thanks in advance. -Matt SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************
- [THIN] Recommendations for Thin client devices
- From: Matt Kosht