[THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices

  • From: Michael Boggan <mboggan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:51:45 -0500

I would have to disagree.  We have implemented Wyse OS terminals for all of our 
cust care offices.  We publish a desktop via a small number of "desktop 
servers" then from there, using pnagent on the desktop session, they are given 
every application they need from across the farm.  it works great.  we have had 
no problems implementing printing, which is mostly network printers imported 
into the farm.  it has worked great. and the wyse terminals are cheap and easy 
to maintenance.  instead of having to have each office keep a staffed IT person 
to troubleshoot and work on PCs, they just get a new terminal, and send the 
defective one back to us to have replaced.  takes less time, less money, and 
less knowledge on their end.  management has loved it because of less staffing 
in the small offices and quicker turn around on the systems that go out. 
 
also, they like the fact that a user can sit anywhere and do the same work on 
the same system they always work on.  Thanks, Michael Boggan


Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:16:55 -0500From: msemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: [THIN] Re: 
Recommendations for Thin client devicesTo: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx








Carl,
 
Excellent post. I think this covers many of the issues we are seeing with these 
thin client devices. We tested
some of the embedded XP devices in and have not been totally satisfied. The 
local printing problem and inability
to install programs locally has led us to recommend installing PC’s for their 
needs.
 
Mike
 




From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Carl StalhoodSent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 7:43 AMTo: 
thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: [THIN] Re: Recommendations for Thin client devices
 
Here is my rant against thin clients. I produced this list based on the 
perspective of somebody that has to manage and support the Presentation Server 
infrastructure.
 
Thin Clients vs. PCs
The ideal end-user device, where full Citrix functionality is possible with 
maximum flexibility and minimum administrative burden, is a Windows based PC 
(Windows XP or above preferred). The following is key functionality of a 
Windows based PC client device when used with a Citrix Presentation Server 
architecture:
·         Full ICA Functionality including SpeedScreen Multimedia Acceleration. 
New ICA functionality is achieved by simply upgrading the ICA client to the 
latest version.
·         Full support of client printing with the Universal Print Driver on 
the Citrix Presentation Servers. This eliminates needing to install print 
drivers on the Citrix Presentation Servers and eliminates needing to configure 
Citrix Policies or complicated scripting to map printers at logon. Essentially, 
all printing functionality is offloaded to the client.
·         Flexibility to run local applications if it is not cost advantageous 
to publish an application from Citrix Presentation Server. When a client device 
runs both local apps and Citrix published apps, Choice Solutions refers to the 
device as a hybrid client. The Citrix PNAgent ICA Client provides seamless 
integration of Citrix published applications into the PC’s Start Menu and 
Desktop meaning that users use one method to launch both local applications and 
Citrix published applications.
Thin Clients are advantageous for shop floors, where moving parts are more 
susceptible to failure, and kiosks, where a minimal device improves security. 
For other cases, thin clients might seem attractive for their lower initial 
cost but there are several reasons to reconsider using them:
·         The ICA client running on a thin client is not fully featured. 
The only thin client OS that supports full ICA client functionality is Embedded 
XP. Some features missing from other thin clients are Universal Print Driver v3 
(the new one in Citrix Presentation Server 4) and SpeedScreen Multimedia 
Acceleration (using client resources to play media files and streaming media 
resulting in user experience identical to playing the media on the PC). 
·         Most thin clients lack client printing requiring network printers to 
be configured on the Citrix Presentation Servers.
Client printing is ideal because the new Universal Print Driver (UPD) does not 
require print drivers to be loaded on the Citrix Presentation Servers. Without 
client printing, network printers are required to be mapped within an ICA 
session. This consists of mapping the printer (using a script or Citrix 
Policies) and loading print drivers on the Presentation Servers. Network 
printers complicate the printing architecture of a Citrix Presentation Server 
architecture. 
If you must implement network printers for thin client printing support, ensure 
that the drivers installed on the Citrix Presentation Servers are all included 
with Windows. Do NOT install drivers downloaded from the printer vendor’s 
website. Also, if installing Windows 2003 x64 on the Presentation Servers, 
ensure that all print drivers are 64-bit.
Thin clients with the Embedded XP OS do support client printers. However, most 
print drivers are not included with the Embedded XP OS requiring the 
administrator to install the drivers on the thin client. Also, not all drivers 
will successfully install on the Embedded XP thin client due to functionality 
removed from the Embedded XP OS to allow it to fit on the flash drive.
·         Most thin clients do not support locally installed applications.
It is rare to see a Citrix Presentation Server implementation where all 
applications are published from Citrix Presentation Servers. The primary reason 
to not install an application on Presentation Server is lack of tangible 
benefits as compared to the cost of integrating the application. Remember, 
every application installed on a Citrix Presentation Server farm must go 
through an extensive testing, configuration, stress loading, and documentation 
process and it is not cost effective to send an application used by a small 
number of users through this process.
Embedded XP thin clients do support locally installed applications with several 
caveats. The flash drive in these thin clients is typically 512 MB or 1 GB in 
size resulting in an inability to install large applications. Larger flash 
drives also increase the price of the thin client putting it in the realm of PC 
pricing. 
While the Embedded XP OS is based on Windows XP, it is a subset of that OS. 
Some applications might require more of Windows XP than is typically available 
on an Embedded XP thin client.
·         Thin clients possess sub-par graphics capability as compared to 
today’s low end PCs.
One method for reducing costs in thin clients is to skimp on the graphics. This 
results in smaller screen resolutions, lower color depth, and noticeably slower 
screen updates. Before buying a particular thin client, let some users try it 
to determine if the graphics performance is acceptable.
·         PNAgent will only run on Embedded XP thin clients.
PNAgent is the preferred method of accessing published applications from a 
client device because it is centrally administered and provides seamless 
integration with the local desktop (shortcuts are placed on the Start Menu, 
Desktop, and in the system tray). PNAgent can be installed and used from 
Embedded XP thin clients only.
For other types of thin clients, consider publishing a desktop with the common 
Start Menu program groups hidden (use Group Policy to do this) and run PNAgent 
within that published desktop. PNAgent will display or not display application 
shortcuts within the published desktop based on a user’s group membership. 
While this is easy to setup, it does provide an additional access method that 
must be maintained.
·         Centralized management of thin clients is proprietary to the thin 
client vendor.
Every thin client vendor offers a software solution for management of their 
thin clients. This management software typically only works with a specific 
vendor’s thin clients. Also, the management software does not integrate with 
other PC management software, like Microsoft SMS, so you must maintain an 
additional client device management infrastructure.
·         Embedded XP thin clients need to be managed just like a PC.
Since most PC functionality is built into Embedded XP thin clients, including 
the ability to catch a virus, these thin clients should be managed just like a 
PC, resulting in increased management costs for this particular class of thin 
clients. Some Embedded XP thin client vendors offer antivirus and firewall 
protection for their Embedded XP thin clients.
A common method of managing Embedded XP thin clients is to join it to a Windows 
domain so the thin client can receive group policies, login scripts, mapped 
printers, etc. Another advantage of joining the domain is that the credentials 
a user uses to log in to the thin client can be passed through the PNAgent 
client eliminating the second logon.
However, the Write Filter, which prevents changes to the flash disk, included 
with these thin clients prevents the thin clients from storing changed domain 
workstation passwords. Either the Write Filter must be disabled or the password 
changing must be disabled. If the Write Filter is disabled, there is potential 
for the user to break the system requiring a thin client image to be reloaded. 
Preventing the workstation password from changing results in reduced network 
security. The DisablePasswordChange registry key will prevent the thin client 
from changing its domain password.
·         All upgrades and support are offered only by the thin client vendor.
Citrix Support cannot provide thin client specific assistance. If an issue is 
discovered on a thin client that cannot be reproduced on a PC, the thin client 
vendor must be contacted for support.
As Citrix releases new versions of the ICA Clients, you must wait for the thin 
client vendor to release an image that includes the newer versions. This could 
result in a discrepancy in features and bug fixes between the PCs and the thin 
clients. 
 
 
-----Original Message-----From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt KoshtSent: Friday, March 
30, 2007 8:32 AMTo: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: [THIN] Re: Recommendations for 
Thin client devices
 
I read this recently. A very good discussion of the relevance of these
devices vs. cheap PC's.
 
http://www.brianmadden.com/content/content.asp?ID=666
SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com 
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Your friends are close to you. Keep them that way.
http://spaces.live.com/signup.aspx

Other related posts: