[THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date
- From: Michael Pardee <pardeemp.list@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:53:45 -0500
And that is kind of my argument Mark what¹s the point? One of the reasons
you move to x64 is to have access to more memory, but they still force you
to the Enterprise edition to really take proper advantage of it. The kernel
has higher memory requirements for x64, right? So we¹re already behind the
8 ball with ram unless we add more memory. In the end it¹s the same as it¹s
always been Microsoft will always get paid.
I have close to 300 Windows2003 Standard Edition Citrix servers, so an
upgrade to support more memory could add up quickly. I¹ll need to run the
numbers of doing this along with a 4GB memory upgrade to get the systems to
8GB (with no guarantee that I will double the amount of users on the same
hardware) versus just adding more hardware and staying 32 bit for now.
From: "Landin, Mark" <Mark.Landin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:51:15 -0600
To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Conversation: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date
Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date
So I wonder what the market is for 64-bit Windows 2003 Server R2 Standard
Edition. Sounds like it's just wasting those 32 extra bits.
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Michael Pardee
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:35 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date
Wait, I found what I was looking at last week...
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/sysreqs/default.mspx
Memory - 128 MB of RAM required; 256 MB or more recommended; 4 GB maximum
On 2/12/07, Turman, David C. <david_turman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I don't believe that is correct. I think you are still limited to 4 GB
>
>
>
>
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Schneider, Chad M
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:25 AM
>
> To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I think 64-bit standard allows up to 16 GIG ram, actually.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Michael Pardee
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:22 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date
>
>
>
>
>
> Now I just need to justify upgrading from Standard Edition to Enterprise
> Edition so we can use more than 4GB. It's time for MS to change their
> specs/licensing. When we go to 64-bot operating systems the Standard Edition
> should allow us to access 8GB, not 4GB.
>
>
>
> On 2/12/07, Greg Reese < gareese@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gareese@xxxxxxxxx> >
> wrote:
>
>
> that's good news then. very good news.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/12/07, Schneider, Chad M < CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Agreed.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Berny Stapleton
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 9:53 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date
>
>
>
>
>
> 64bit, small apps, loads of memory. Possible.
>
>
>
>
>
> Would I really want to do it without a heap of testing and a few hotfixes.
> Nope.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Schneider, Chad M
> Sent: 12 February 2007 15:48
> To: ' thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> '
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date
>
>
>
>
>
> Depending on the hardware, software, and use of 64-bit, sure, I buy it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Greg Reese
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 9:43 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I am skeptical about their claim of 500 user per server. I'll beleive it when
> I see it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Does anyone know if all portions of presentation server are 64-bit now? In PS
> 4 64 bit, some pieces were still 32 bit (like ima).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I am in the middle of a new deployment and have a mess of 64 bit servers.
> Citrix consulting recommended we go 32 bit all the way which seems like a
> waste to me. Their reasoning was that 32 bit PS code was better all around
> than the 64bit edition.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/12/07, Joe Shonk < joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Now that Feb 11th has passed and Citrix has made its announcement, we can
> now talk about it.
>
>
>
>
>
> http://citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=164024&ntref=hp_article_head
> lines_US
> <http://citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=164024&ntref=hp_article
> _headlines_US>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.brainmadden.com/content/content.asp?id=672
> <http://www.brainmadden.com/content/content.asp?id=672>
>
>
>
>
>
> Looks like Feb 22nd to D/l and March 8th for General Availability according
> to Brian.
>
>
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Michael Pardee
> www.blindsquirrel.org <http://www.blindsquirrel.org>
--
Michael Pardee
www.blindsquirrel.org <http://www.blindsquirrel.org>
Other related posts:
