[THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date

This is huge.  Thanks guys.  I just looked at MS's site last week and saw
conflicting information.  I'll post it if I find it again.  Until then...

"Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard x64 Edition, supports up to 32 GB of RAM on
1- to 4-way servers."

On 2/12/07, Schneider, Chad M <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 Better yet!


 ------------------------------

*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *IT Support
*Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2007 10:35 AM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date



Confirmation:-



http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/64bit/x64/standard.mspx









Regards

Jaime
  ------------------------------

*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Schneider, Chad M
*Sent:* 12 February 2007 16:25
*To:* 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
*Subject:* [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date



I think 64-bit standard allows up to 16 GIG ram, actually.


  ------------------------------

*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Michael Pardee
*Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2007 10:22 AM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date



Now I just need to justify upgrading from Standard Edition to Enterprise
Edition so we can use more than 4GB.  It's time for MS to change their
specs/licensing.  When we go to 64-bot operating systems the Standard
Edition should allow us to access 8GB, not 4GB.

On 2/12/07, *Greg Reese* <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

that's good news then.  very good news.



On 2/12/07, *Schneider, Chad M* <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:

Agreed.




  ------------------------------

*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Berny Stapleton
*Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2007 9:53 AM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date



64bit,  small apps, loads of memory. Possible.



Would I really want to do it without a heap of testing and a few hotfixes.
Nope.



*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Schneider, Chad M
*Sent:* 12 February 2007 15:48
*To:* ' thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
*Subject:* [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date



Depending on the hardware, software, and use of 64-bit, sure, I buy it.






  ------------------------------

*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Greg Reese
*Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2007 9:43 AM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.5 Release Date



I am skeptical about their claim of 500 user per server. I'll beleive it
when I see it.



Does anyone know if all portions of presentation server are 64-bit now? In
PS 4 64 bit, some pieces were still 32 bit (like ima).



I am in the middle of a new deployment and have a mess of 64 bit servers.
Citrix consulting recommended we go 32 bit all the way which seems like a
waste to me.  Their reasoning was that 32 bit PS code was better all around
than the 64bit edition.



Greg



On 2/12/07, *Joe Shonk* < joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Now that Feb 11th has passed and Citrix has made its announcement, we can
now talk about it.



http://citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=164024&ntref=hp_article_headlines_US




http://www.brainmadden.com/content/content.asp?id=672



Looks like Feb 22nd to D/l and March 8th for General Availability
according to Brian.



Joe








--

Michael Pardee
www.blindsquirrel.org



Click here <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg==> to
report this email as spam.




--

Michael Pardee
www.blindsquirrel.org

Other related posts: