[THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- From: "Tim Mangan" <tmangan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:40:36 -0400
The exception is when an IDIOT† priorities ICA the same as HTTP. ICA needs
to be higher priority.
tim
†OK, OK, not idiot, just “mal informed”.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:23 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
If anything the packetshaper should improve the performance not hinder it.
If it is network issues I would start looking at portfast settings if cisco
switches..
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html And also make sure that duplex
speeds are properly configured on the server network cards and switches.
Also check out Michaels article on performance issues where he touches on
the Maxworkitems registry keys..
http://www.msterminalservices.org/articles/Fileserving-Terminal-Server-Envir
onments-Part2.html
JK
"Parr, Steve" <sparr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Will be troubleshooting a situation at a company where Packetshaper is used
including Citrix traffic. Any heads up about the use of Packetshaper and
Citrix. Apparently they are having some performance issues.
- References:
- [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- From: Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] Packetshaper and Citrix
- » [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- » [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- » [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- » [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- » [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- » [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- » [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- » [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
- From: Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com