[THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- From: "Schneider, Chad M" <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:03:53 -0500
I actually like the new AMC, just wish it was all AMC, or all CMC, not mostly
AMC, with some CMC.
I have found the UPD to be much more reliable and functional in our environment.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Greg Reese
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 10:40 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
the unified code base for 64 bit servers is the biggest kicker in my opinion.
And yes, the Access Management Console sucks. I'd rather they went back to the
java tool at this point.
On 8/29/07, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Application Hub (formerly call app streaming) and R01 introduced support for
shiny 32-color icons (finally).
Joe
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jon Luchette
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 6:44 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] PS 4.5
Hi -
What do you all think is the single biggest reason to upgrade to Presentation
Server 4.5 from either MF XP or PS 4.0?
-Jon
- References:
- [THIN] PS 4.5
- From: Jon Luchette
- [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- From: Joe Shonk
- [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- From: Greg Reese
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] PS 4.5
- » [THIN] PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- » [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- [THIN] PS 4.5
- From: Jon Luchette
- [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- From: Joe Shonk
- [THIN] Re: PS 4.5
- From: Greg Reese