[THIN] Re: Order of install

What would be the reasoning?  Patching is an on-going process and would
continue long after the drives have been remapped.

Joe

On 7/31/06, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

First thing I would do is not remap the drives.  :)

Otherwise, I would install all Win2k3 patches first.  Then remap, then PS.


Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server

Forums not enough?
Get support from the experts at your business
http://jeffpitschconsulting.com



On 7/31/06, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   Remap the drive as soon as humanly possible… That is if you REALLY,
> REALLY have a burning need to remap the drives.  Otherwise, don't remap the
> drives.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *craig batch
> *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2006 3:34 PM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Order of install
>
>
>
> What would you guys recommend as an installation order for 2003 with PS
> 4.0? If you were going to remap drives for Citrix, would you do this
> first or install all OS patches first?
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> See the all-new, redesigned Yahoo.com <http://yahoo.com/>. Check it 
out.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40762/*http:/www.yahoo.com/preview>
>


Other related posts: