[THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- From: "Beckett, William \(Bill\)" <bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:18:51 -0400
Yeah I read that, thanks. Seems to be a per device licensing so a per
user lockdown would not really work unless you could guarantee that the
user would always use a particular machine
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:02 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
Microsoft has a paper on this:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/6/c/c/6ccc82b3-d254-4cb7-bada-62a
720ae4598/Office%20Licensing%20within%20a%20Terminal%20Services%20Enviro
nment.doc
Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
Provision Networks VIP
Forums not enough?
Get support from the experts at your business
http://jeffpitschconsulting.com <http://jeffpitschconsulting.com/>
On 9/29/06, Matthew Shrewsbury <MShrewsbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You can call them at 1800 426-9400 for licensing questions.
Matthew Shrewsbury, MCSE+Internet MCSE 2000 CCA Server+
Network Manager
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Beckett, William (Bill)
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 10:29 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
Tried that but the email came back as undeliverable to
licensing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On
Behalf Of Jez
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 10:22 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
I think not. I had a similar query about 2 years ago. The
response I got
from licensing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx was "no - Office is a per user
license, not
a per concurrent user license", so you need a license for each
user who
uses office. Note, certain licenses allow you to have office
installed
on more than 1 PC, provided you only use 1 at a time.
For a definate answer, send you query to:
licensing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 9/29/06, Beckett, William (Bill) <
bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Can I get some people to weigh in on the following scenario? -
>
> With a published application environment, you can restrict who
gets
> access to what. If you don't want someone running office on a
Citrix
> box, then you can prevent them from running Office on a Citrix
box. So
> let's say I have 5 MS office 2003 licenses. I install it and
publish
> it for 5 users in the farm. Am I legal within those boundaries
from a
> Microsoft licensing perspective? Enviroment is Win2003 TS with
PS 4.0
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or
Vacation
mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- From: Ruben Spruijt
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- » [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- [THIN] Re: Office and legalities
- From: Ruben Spruijt