Mallesons Stephen Jaques www.mallesons.com Confidential communication 3 years of 11 active active win2k clusters on a HP XP512 storage array all raid 5 and then luns of 13gb except a bunch of 1gb we made for the quorums doing the same thing on 2 new EMC disk array also. not a single issue yet with the config. although this time for exchange, sql and oracle logs disks we have maid some raid 1+0 luns for better performance. Roly John Rowlandson Technical Support Specialist Mallesons Stephen Jaques Sydney T +61 2 9296 3653 F +61 2 9296 3676 john.rowlandson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: Lee, David (CITY TREASURY) [mailto:David.Lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, 27 June 2003 11:46 PM To: Thin client listserve (E-mail) Subject: [THIN] OT - MSCS quorum disks on a SAN Judging by recent posts there are obviously quite a few people with a lot of MSCS and SAN experience on the list.....can anyone help with a question about dividing up disks in this environment? We currently have a project underway to implement some major new SQL applications, upgrade Exchange and replace multiple old Novell file servers, hence have been talking to various SAN suppliers and have got to the stage where we are receiving quotes and specifications. It has been determined that at least three Windows 2000 MSCS clusters will be required to support these services, with a possible later expansion for other applications. The leading supplier has quoted for a SAN with around 2Tb 'raw' storage, but obviously a chunk of this will not be useable due to meeting the requirements of RAID, hot spares etc. I have been told that standard practice is to assign most of the SAN disks to a RAID 5 array, which would be divided up into LUNs which will be assigned to the respective servers. However, I have also been told that Microsoft recommend the quorum drive of a cluster sit on a dedicated mirrored pair of disks, rather than assigning a LUN from this main RAID 5 array. Obviously, with three clusters this would knock a further six disks off the usable storage space. However, the supplier has suggested to reduce cost that a single mirrored pair of disks could be partitioned to hold the quorums for all three clusters, which seems to me like too many eggs in one basket, mirrored or not! Sorry for the long winded explanation, I guess I can summarise by saying I'm really just trying to establish what is standard practice out there for implementing multiple MSCS cluster quorum disks on a SAN - any thoughts or ideas appreciated. Thanks in advance David Lee Systems Engineer City Treasury Plymouth City Council Civic Centre PL1 2AA Tel: (01752) - 304218 DISCLAIMER "The views expressed in this message are personal and must not be considered to be the official views of Plymouth City Council." ******************************************************** This weeks sponsor - RTOSoft TScale Complaints about applications response time - DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! TScale 2.0 improves applications response time and increases terminal server capacity. Really get MORE from your existing servers! Free eval: http://www.rtosoft.com/enter.asp?id=130 ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thethin.net/links.cfm For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm ******************************************************** This weeks sponsor - RTOSoft TScale Complaints about applications response time - DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! TScale 2.0 improves applications response time and increases terminal server capacity. Really get MORE from your existing servers! Free eval: http://www.rtosoft.com/enter.asp?id=130 ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thethin.net/links.cfm For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm