[THIN] Re: OT: Exchange - bringing e-mail in-house

Agree.  Definitely want to put something else in between.  Harden a box,
fully patch it (and keep it up to date with required patches), install
mailsweeper with AV plugins etc or something similar on it and chuck it
into the DMZ.  Hardening the box properly will also lower the number of
patches you are required to put on there as services, ports etc are
disabled.  May want to consider redundant kit if mail is key to your
organisation.

 

This also gives you a place to park your mail if exchange decides it
doesn't want to be postman for a day.

 

Doug

 

________________________________

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch
Sent: 29 November 2005 21:01
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Exchange - bringing e-mail in-house

 

My entire point of that post though was to eliminate your exchange box
being directly exposed to the internet.  Not something you typically
want to do.

 

Jeff

 

On 11/29/05, Philip Walley <mythinlist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

2003s built in spam filter seems to be a pretty good product.

Grant, Lachlan ISMC:EX wrote:

>I've used both NetIQ's MailMarshall and ClearSwift's MIMEsweeper in a
DMZ to
>handle both incoming and outgoing mail which will also stop you from
putting
>your exchange server up for grabs. They both do pretty well if you've
got 
>the hardware for them. I prefered MailMarshall, it seemed to be more
stable
>than MIMESweeper.
>
>You can do some really neat content filtering stuff with these
products,
>especially if you've got a user base who likes to push the rules....
And 
>also makes some pretty reports to justify more spending or anything
else
>you'd like to prove.
>
>Lachlan.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf
>Of Philip Walley
>Sent: November 29, 2005 12:22 PM
>To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Exchange - bringing e-mail in-house
>
>
>trend scanmail, runs on the server and works like a champ
>
>Jeff Pitsch wrote:
>
>
>
>>On those thoughts, you may want to make another box in the DMZ the
>>receipient of the mail, scan it, do whatever with it, then forward it
>>on to the exchange box.  that way you protect yourself. 
>>
>>Jeff Pitsch
>>
>>
>>On 11/29/05, *Philip Walley* <mythinlist@xxxxxxxxx
>><mailto: mythinlist@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mythinlist@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote:
>>
>>    You'd want to change the MX and the A records I believe, but yeah,
>>    that
>>    and making sure that you have a public IP on your outside nat'd to

>>    the
>>    correct internal with port 25 open. Bingo! it works. You do need
>>    to make
>>    sure that the recipient policy is setup for your external email
>>    address. 
>>    Exchange 2003 needs that to ensure that it will route it
>>correctly.
>>
>>    Jeff Pitsch wrote:
>>
>>    > Maybe this is my ignorance but isn't it a simple change of the
MX 
>>    > record and making sure the proper port and IP is NAT'd through
the
>>    > firewall to the server.
>>    >
>>    > Jeff Pitsch
>>    >
>>    > 
>>    > On 11/29/05, *Mark Mucher* <mmucher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>    <mailto:mmucher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>    > <mailto: mmucher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mmucher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
>>    wrote:
>>    >
>>    >     Sorry for the OT, but I couldn't think of a better group to 
>>    steer
>>    >     me in the right direction.
>>    >
>>    >     We have Exchange 2003 on Server 2003 with internal e-mail
and
>>    >     calendaring, etc. enabled. 
>>    >
>>    >     The task now is to bring the external e-mail (now hosted by
and
>>    >     ISP with our domain name) in-house.
>>    >
>>    >     I'm looking for a white paper, tutorial, etc. that will 
>>    cover all
>>    >     the steps including routing the public IP to the Exchange
>>    server.
>>    >
>>    >     Thanks in advance for any and all suggestions. 
>>    >
>>    >     Mark
>>    >
>>    >
>>    ************************************************
>>    For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
>>    set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: 
>>    http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
>>    ************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>************************************************ 
>For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
>set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
>http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
>************************************************ 
>************************************************
>For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
>set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
>http://www.freelists.org/list/thin 
>************************************************
>
>
>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: 
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

 


**************************************************************************** 



SMOKE ALARMS SAVE LIVES



Go to London Fire at www.london-fire.gov.uk/firesafety 



This email is confidential to the addressee only. If you do not believe that
you are the intended addressee, do not use, pass on or copy it in any way.
If you have received it in error, please delete it immediately and telephone
the supplied number, reversing the charges if necessary.

Other related posts: