[THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- From: Michael Boggan <MBoggan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:37:40 -0700
Yeah we tried to run McAffee on citrix and it blew up the servers. I wasn't
a happy camper. Been using Trend for about a month now and it works great.
_________________________________
Michael Boggan
Network Engineer/Citrix Admin
Virtual Desktop Inc.
Dallas, Texas
Ph: (972) 960-6400
Fax: (972) 960-6445
email: mboggan@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.virtualdesktopinc.com
_________________________________
For Technical Support please send email to support@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Fowler [mailto:mfowler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 11:25 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] McAfee NetShield
Anyone have any comments on the effectiveness, or lack thereof, of McAfee's
4.5.1 netshield running on Windows 2000 w/MetaFrame XPa? I have seen a lot
of threads on Trend Micro - is that the preferred virus scan software in
the Citrix environment? All of our NT workstations already run McAfee, just
not our Citrix servers.
Thanks for any help.
Matt Fowler
LAN Specialist
(847)925-6113
mfowler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
===================================
This weeks Sponsor:
ThinPrint
- High resolution, DRIVER FREE PRINTING with no loss of quality in color.
- Removes print spooling and rendering tasks from your terminal server.
http://www.thinprint.com
===================================
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
===================================
This weeks Sponsor:
ThinPrint
- High resolution, DRIVER FREE PRINTING with no loss of quality in color.
- Removes print spooling and rendering tasks from your terminal server.
http://www.thinprint.com
===================================
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- From: Jim Werner
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- » [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- [THIN] Re: McAfee NetShield
- From: Jim Werner