[THIN] Re: Loopback

  • From: "Joe Shonk" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:36:06 -0700

No, that's the whole point of loopback processing.  Only the Computer
Policies will apply to the servers in your OU1.    If you wish to apply User
policies to the Users that login to a machine in OU1 you need to enable
loopback policies,  otherwise the users will get policies for the OU (and
inherited) their account is in.

 

Joe

 

  _____  

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Evan Mann
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:24 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Loopback

 

Ok, good example, I follow.  So lets so at the domain level screen saver 1
runs after 5 mins.


In the OU1 with my TS server, I have no loopback but set but have a GPO that
sets screen saver2 to run at 5 minutes.

 

Shouldn't this GPO in OU1 still apply to change the screen saver setting,
even with loopback disabled?

 

 

  _____  

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Frank Monroe
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 12:10 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Loopback

Loopback is great for terminal servers.  For example, you may have a domain
policy that sets a specific screen savor to run on all systems.  However,
when the users logon to your terminal servers, you may want a different
screen savor or none at all.  What loopback does is apply the user policy
settings when a user logs into a particular system that is in an OU rather
than using the OU's that the user's account is in only.  Loopback only
replaces policies from higher OU's if the collide.

-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Mann [mailto:emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:59 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Loopback

Right, I realize you CAN override, but does it FORCE an override for an
entire GPO or just specific settings?


I'm a little confused as to why use loopback at all?  To enable loopback on
specific machines you'd need to create an OU and put those machines in it.
Once you have this setup, any GPO applied on that OU will have precedence
over any domain OU.  So why enable loopback if you can just do your
overrides natively with GPO precendence order?


Or am I just missing something obvious?

 


  _____  


From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Frank Monroe
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:47 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Loopback

It depends how you do it.  Loopback will override settings at a higher level
if they are also set at the loopback level.

-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Mann [mailto:emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:41 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Loopback

Does loopback force override or just allow it?  

So to enable loopback on specific machines you have to put a TS/Citrix box
in a dedicated OU with a GPO to enable loopback, correct?


Now lets say I have a domain level OU to enable screen saver after 5 mins.
Does this still apply to the TS/Citrix OU with loopback on?

 

 


  _____  


From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Bill Beckett
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:34 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Loopback

Ahhh, that just answered my Win98 question. Thanks Ron.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Oglesby [mailto:roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday December 01, 2004 11:31 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Loopback

One thing in that sentence. "the client" is not the Citrix/TS client, it is
the Terminal server. 

 

Ron Oglesby

Senior Technical Architect

Microsoft MVP, Windows Server 

 

RapidApp, Chicago

Office 312.372.7188

Mobile 815.325.7618

email roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lilley, Brian [mailto:brian.lilley@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:27 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: Loopback

 

correct...

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
Of Bill Beckett
Sent: 01 December 2004 16:20
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Loopback

Just want to hear from the list and make sure that I am understanding this
correctly. With loopback processing, say on a Terminal Server, the user
policy inherited from the domain can be over-ridden by the policies of that
on the Terminal server box. However, it does not work if the user account is
in an NT domain OR if the client is not a Windows 2000 client??? Is that
accurate?

============================================================================
==
This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received
this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was
misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB
retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network.
Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they
are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure.
============================================================================
==

Other related posts: