No....had not thought of that. What is that command again? -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Walley Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 1:54 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Load Balancing not working have you checked the load via the cmd line to see what it reports? Schneider, Chad M wrote: > Server now showing 36% load, still failing to connect, server is > unavailable. > > 8 of 70 servers doing this. > > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of Philip Walley > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 1:39 PM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: Load Balancing not working > > i would think so > > Schneider, Chad M wrote: > >> Do I need to restart the IMA after changing the load evaluator on a >> > server? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> > Behalf > >> Of Schneider, Chad M >> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 11:31 AM >> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [THIN] Re: Load Balancing not working >> >> Trying that now. >> >> Default being used for load balancing of both the servers as well as the >> applications affected. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> > Behalf > >> Of Philip Walley >> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:54 AM >> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [THIN] Re: Load Balancing not working >> >> have you switched back to the default evaluator to see if the problem >> goes away. I remember back in XP there were some issues that I saw where >> custom load evaluators were not working properly and had to be recreated. >> >> >> Schneider, Chad M wrote: >> >> >>> I have apps. spread across 8 servers, all are using only load >>> evaluator based on users load. All are @ 50% of that load #, yet users >>> can't get into appliations on those servers, as the server lists as >>> unavailable. If I knock a few users who are idle for a couple hours >>> off, then user can get in, until the server gets "busy" again. >>> >>> The servers are not busy, DL360's, MPS 4.0 R01, W2K and W2K3 servers. >>> >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Chad Schneider >>> >>> Technology Analyst/Citrix Admin. >>> >>> Bemis Company, Inc. >>> >>> 920-303-7609 >>> >>> >>> >> ************************************************ >> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or >> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: >> //www.freelists.org/list/thin >> ************************************************ >> >> ************************************************ >> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or >> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: >> //www.freelists.org/list/thin >> ************************************************ >> >> ************************************************ >> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or >> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: >> //www.freelists.org/list/thin >> ************************************************ >> >> >> > ************************************************ > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > //www.freelists.org/list/thin > ************************************************ > > ************************************************ > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > //www.freelists.org/list/thin > ************************************************ > > ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************ ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************