[THIN] Re: Juniper

Thanks a ton for the information.

>>> andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 11/15/2007 4:48 AM >>>

Yep, 
Running with it with a couple of  government customers to provide secure access 
to restricted level networks.
We’re using the 4000 FIPS appliance, but I’ve used the smaller ones. I also 
like the lab license option that they do for development.
When the CAG first came out I thought the interface and reliability of the IVE 
was much better than what the CAG had to offer – it also offered FIPS 
compliance at the lower end whereas the CAG didn’t.
As time has moved on Citrix have done some work on the CAG,  and it does seem 
to be catching up – there’s also now a greater amount of interaction between 
the CAG and your Citrix environment that you just don’t get on the IVE. 
That said, the ability to reconfigure the login process and configuration 
options seemed to be wider with the IVE than the CAG.
Cost and availability wise I thought that the Juniper was better – but you 
might find that different personally I think the management and maintenance of 
the IVEs is far more straightforward than the CAGs were, but I’ve not seen the 
latest cag interface releases.
Reliability wise we’ve had no problems at all (queue the thing falling over now 
all next week)
hth

From:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Chad Schneider (IT)
Sent: 14 November 2007 14:11
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [THIN] Juniper

 

Does anyone have experience with the Juniper SSL VPN appliance?

 

I have an Access Gateway in for eval at this time, and some would like me to 
get another comparable unit it, to make the best decision.

 

Juniper SSL VPN 700 was recommended.

 

Anyone with exprience?  How does it compare to the CAG?

 

 

Chad Schneider
Systems Engineer
ThedaCare IT
920-735-7615

Other related posts: