[THIN] Re: IM issue
- From: "Michael Boggan" <mboggan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:09:31 -0600
The script that we run to recreate the lhc also restarts the IMA so it goes
down during the script but comes back up before it finishes. Appears to be
working now. I created a IM package that installs SP4, installs the hotfix
rollout, then recreates the LHC, and then reboots. It appears to be working
great right now. Don't know why I have to recreate the LHC but if it works it
works.
----- Original Message -----
From: Philip Walley<mailto:mythinlist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:47 AM
Subject: [THIN] Re: IM issue
isn't pushing something on installation manager that stops the IMA
service a bad idea?
Michael Boggan wrote:
> Using Installation Manager.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Jeff Pitsch
<mailto:jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>>
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 28, 2005 3:18 PM
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: IM issue
>
> Event log errors? How are you pushing the installation?
>
> Jeff Pitsch
>
>
> On 12/28/05, *Michael Boggan*
<mboggan@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mboggan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:mboggan@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mboggan@xxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>
> We are trying to push XPe FR3 SP4 out to our servers. We
> pushed it out to a test server and when it reboots the IMA
> service will not start. Has anyone seen this before? We have
> a script that we could push out to the box to recreate the LHC
> but we can't push it out because the IMA service isn't
> running. Any suggestions?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael Boggan
>
>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin<http://www.freelists.org/list/thin>
************************************************
- References:
- [THIN] IM issue
- From: Michael Boggan
- [THIN] Re: IM issue
- From: Jeff Pitsch
- [THIN] Re: IM issue
- From: Michael Boggan
- [THIN] Re: IM issue
- From: Philip Walley
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] IM issue
- » [THIN] Re: IM issue
- » [THIN] Re: IM issue
- » [THIN] Re: IM issue
- » [THIN] Re: IM issue
- » [THIN] Re: IM issue
- » [THIN] Re: IM issue
- » [THIN] Re: IM issue
- [THIN] IM issue
- From: Michael Boggan
- [THIN] Re: IM issue
- From: Jeff Pitsch
- [THIN] Re: IM issue
- From: Michael Boggan
- [THIN] Re: IM issue
- From: Philip Walley