I had figured into my costs purchasing a new $6K server every 3 years, I gussed at a citrix License maint at $2k/ Year Adding 50 thins in year 1, 30 in years 2-4, and 10 in year 5. Then replacing 3 thins per year for broken machines. I have not added the cost of increased storage needs into these equations. Is this unrealistic? I thought these things ran forever....:) Is there a industry standard for replacing thin clients like fat clients? We replace fat clients at a rate of 20%/year so we never have a computer over 5 years old. I have figured I can replace ~85% of my fat clients with thin clients. I have this all charted out on a spread sheet. If you want to take a look at it i'll e-mail it to you. Any extra eyes looking at it that knows more about this than I would be helpful. Keith Keith Sirmons Microcomputer/LAN Administrator College of Veterinary Medicine >>> jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx 10/28/2005 11:46 AM >>> "it would pay for itself after 3 years and save us more than $175,000 over the next 10 years" Are you serious?? Where would the savings be? In 10 years none of your servers OR the wyse winterminals will be working. Not to mention the fact that they will be so outdated they won't run any of the current software that is being delivered at the time. You should set your self up on a 3-5 year amortization plan for servers and at least a 5 year on workstations. JK Keith Sirmons <KSirmons@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Ok.. I forgot that MS load balance isn't great. We want to pull the app from the current desktops and put it on Citrix so it can easily be used from not only here, but from around the world via web page. This number may make the corporate world sick, but the licenses are just under $250 each for Citrix for us and that is still out of budget. We figure if this app were the only thing the servers were doing, 1 server would handle the entire load. I want 2 so I have an N+1 config. If we get to move toward thin clients, then I would keep buying servers and always keep the N+1 config going. My goal was to have all Wyse thin clients managed by Rapport. Our custom app, GroupWise, and MS Office all deployed via Citrix. I figured it would pay for itself after 3 years and save us more than $175,000 over the next 10 years. I'm trying to find a middle road to go down to get to my final goal with out laying $38K cash down on day 1. Goal 1 is to move the app to Citrix and off the fat clients. Another reason for looking at Citrix was so I could move all servers to a VLAN to segregate it from all of the other traffic and use Citrix as a "Application Gateway" (I think that is the correct term) Goal 2 is get 80%-90% all machines moved to thin over the next 3 years. Sorry if I have rambled. Keith Keith Sirmons Microcomputer/LAN Administrator College of Veterinary Medicine >>> Claudio.Rodrigues@xxxxxxxxxx 10/28/2005 10:01 AM >>> And why not use other options than Citrix? If all he needs is to publish a single application, Citrix may be way overkill for that. For 'published desktops' there is not much difference between Citrix and plain TS. He does not mention how many servers he will have but given the amount of users, should not be many so you can load balance RDP with other products as well. Just my $0.02 here. Cláudio Rodrigues Microsoft MVP Windows Server - Terminal Services http://www.2x.com. ________________________________ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Russell Robertson Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 10:30 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Hybrid question? Why not use Citrix to do both? Publish the desktop via Citrix and run the custom app within the desktop or not, the choice is yours. There is academic pricing too if you are a college. You don't have to invest in new clients, you can use any old desktop as a thin client. Cheers Russell Russell Robertson Skibo Technologies The Software Centre Aberdeen Science & Technology Park Balgownie Drive, ABERDEEN AB22 8GU T: +44 (0)1224 355250 E: russell.robertson@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:russell.robertson@xxxxxxxxxx> W: www.skibo.com <http://www.skibo.com/> Microsoft Certified Partners Citrix Solutions Advisers Northern Business Star Awards Finalists 2005 ________________________________ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keith Sirmons Sent: 28 October 2005 15:23 To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Hybrid question? Thin Gurus, We want to move an application from being installed on all client machines to a Citrix server. This really is not a problem. Since we were looking to invest into Citrix, I decided it would be a good idea to move toward using thin clients from Wyse. Well, it looks like the high initial cost of Citrix is keeping us from converting to the Holy Grail of thin computing. Here is the question**. Is there a way we can use Citrix to deploy our custom application to the entire organization and use Microsoft Terminal services to deploy desktops to thin clients at the same time on the same set of servers? We know at any given time there are at most 60 users using the app that would be on Citrix. When I was gathering prices, I had my Citrix licenses neede d at 250 to be able to handle not only this app but also MS office and GroupWise. Any thoughts on this hybrid option would be very helpful. Thank you in advance, Keith Sirmons Keith Sirmons Microcomputer/LAN Administrator College of Veterinary Medicine ******************************************************** This Weeks Sponsor: Cesura, Inc. Know about Citrix end-user slowdowns before they know. Know the probable cause, immediately. Know it all now with this free white paper. http://www.cesurasolutions.com/landing/WPBCForCitrix.htm?mc=WETBCC ******************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! http://www.thinwiki.com *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm