I would re-read this.... http://support.microsoft.com/kb/909444 Have you installed MS05-051? Malcolm -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M Sent: 18 October 2005 13:52 To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot Mfcom.exe is 4.0.2198.1. -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ALEX . Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 1:36 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot Can you check what MFCOM build you have? And I presume you did re-register the exe? ALEX >From: "Schneider, Chad M" <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> >Reply-To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot >Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:41:27 -0500 > >Did that, rebooted, still getting MFCOM.exe memory was unable to be >written. > > > > _____ > >From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >Behalf >Of Jeff Pitsch >Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 7:18 PM >To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot > > > >Did you try recreating the LHC? > > > >Jeff > > > >On 10/17/05, Schneider, Chad M <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx ><mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >Disable Mcafee did not work. Errors still exist. > > > >Anyone else have ideas? > > > > _____ > >From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] >On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch >Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 3:13 PM >To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot > > > >yea I was just trying to see if McAfee was actually the issue or not. >Easier to disable it temporarily to see if it is the problem, than wait >and see for patching. Immediate answer versus possibly putting on a >patch that breaks more stuff. > > > >Jeff > > > >On 10/17/05, Evan Mann < <mailto:emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >11 has issues on Domain Controllers. It was replaced with 11a which >uses >the >filter drive from 10. Otherwise, it seems to be fine. > > > > > > _____ > >From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >[mailto: ><mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of >Schneider, Chad M >Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 4:03 PM >To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot > > > >I will first patch it, I see patches 10 and 11 are out, and reference from >an iForum presentation, that 11 is useful. > > > >My Mcafee guy did not even know 11 was available. > > > > _____ > >From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On >Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch >Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 2:55 PM >To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot > > > >Have you tried disabling it to see if it corrects the problem. Lately with >my clients, I'm seeing lots of issues iwth mcafee and metaframe. > > > >Jeff > > > >On 10/17/05, Schneider, Chad M < CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx ><mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >I definitely have it, Mcafee, has been on these servers for years. 8.0. > > > > _____ > >From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On >Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch >Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 2:28 PM >To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot > > > >the age old question, Anti-virus? > > > >Jeff > > > >On 10/17/05, Schneider, Chad M < CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx ><mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >"mfcom.exe - Application Error : The instruction at "0x77fcc024" referenced >memory at "0x00000000". The memory could not be written." > > > >Information at CTX 105062 is not the answer. > > > >MPS 3.0 > > > >W2K SP4. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ******************************************************** This Weeks Sponsor: Cesura, Inc. Know about Citrix end-user slowdowns before they know. Know the probable cause, immediately. Know it all now with this free white paper. http://www.cesurasolutions.com/landing/WPBCForCitrix.htm?mc=WETBCC ******************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! http://www.thinwiki.com *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm ******************************************************** This Weeks Sponsor: Cesura, Inc. Know about Citrix end-user slowdowns before they know. Know the probable cause, immediately. Know it all now with this free white paper. http://www.cesurasolutions.com/landing/WPBCForCitrix.htm?mc=WETBCC ******************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! http://www.thinwiki.com *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm *********************************************************************************** The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate. Visit our websites at: http://www.rbs.co.uk/CBFM http://www.rbsmarkets.com ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************** This Weeks Sponsor: Cesura, Inc. Know about Citrix end-user slowdowns before they know. Know the probable cause, immediately. Know it all now with this free white paper. http://www.cesurasolutions.com/landing/WPBCForCitrix.htm?mc=WETBCC ******************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! http://www.thinwiki.com *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm