[THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot

  • From: "Schneider, Chad M" <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:51:33 -0500

Re-register the exe?

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of ALEX .
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 1:36 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot

Can you check what MFCOM build you have? And I presume you did re-register 
the exe?

ALEX

>From: "Schneider, Chad M" <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot
>Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:41:27 -0500
>
>Did that, rebooted, still getting MFCOM.exe memory was unable to be 
>written.
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>Behalf
>Of Jeff Pitsch
>Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 7:18 PM
>To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot
>
>
>
>Did you try recreating the LHC?
>
>
>
>Jeff
>
>
>
>On 10/17/05, Schneider, Chad M <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx
><mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>
>Disable Mcafee did not work.  Errors still exist.
>
>
>
>Anyone else have ideas?
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On
>Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch
>Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 3:13 PM
>To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot
>
>
>
>yea I was just trying to see if McAfee was actually the issue or not.
>Easier to disable it temporarily to see if it is the problem, than wait and
>see for patching.  Immediate answer versus possibly putting on a patch that
>breaks more stuff.
>
>
>
>Jeff
>
>
>
>On 10/17/05, Evan Mann < <mailto:emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>11 has issues on Domain Controllers. It was replaced with 11a which uses 
>the
>filter drive from 10.  Otherwise, it seems to be fine.
>
>
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
>[mailto:
><mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Schneider, Chad M
>Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 4:03 PM
>To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot
>
>
>
>I will first patch it, I see patches 10 and 11 are out, and reference from
>an iForum presentation, that 11 is useful.
>
>
>
>My Mcafee guy did not even know 11 was available.
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On
>Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch
>Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 2:55 PM
>To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot
>
>
>
>Have you tried disabling it to see if it corrects the problem.  Lately with
>my clients, I'm seeing lots of issues iwth mcafee and metaframe.
>
>
>
>Jeff
>
>
>
>On 10/17/05, Schneider, Chad M < CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx
><mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>
>I definitely have it, Mcafee, has been on these servers for years.  8.0.
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On
>Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch
>Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 2:28 PM
>To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [THIN] Re: Getting the following MFCOM.exe error after reboot
>
>
>
>the age old question, Anti-virus?
>
>
>
>Jeff
>
>
>
>On 10/17/05, Schneider, Chad M < CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx
><mailto:CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>
>"mfcom.exe - Application Error : The instruction at "0x77fcc024" referenced
>memory at "0x00000000". The memory could not be written."
>
>
>
>Information at CTX 105062 is not the answer.
>
>
>
>MPS 3.0
>
>
>
>W2K SP4.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor: Cesura, Inc.
Know about Citrix end-user slowdowns before they know.
Know the probable cause, immediately.
Know it all now with this free white paper.
http://www.cesurasolutions.com/landing/WPBCForCitrix.htm?mc=WETBCC
******************************************************** 
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
http://www.thinwiki.com
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm

********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor: Cesura, Inc.
Know about Citrix end-user slowdowns before they know.
Know the probable cause, immediately.
Know it all now with this free white paper.
http://www.cesurasolutions.com/landing/WPBCForCitrix.htm?mc=WETBCC
******************************************************** 
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
http://www.thinwiki.com
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm

Other related posts: