Not at all. 24 Hour Fitness owns and operates about 380 fitness clubs nationally. Each of our clubs is connected back to the corporate data center through a DSL-based VPN link. Each club has 8 to 12 Wyse CE-based Winterms that run a published application consisting of Internet Explorer in kiosk mode that is configured to start our web-based membership application. The web-based application is used to enroll members and handle all the additional ancillary functions associated with club membership such as fitness training sessions, member check-ins, lead tracking, appointment booking, etc. There you have it! rob -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shawn Tooley Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 4:38 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Flash on MF XPe 1.0 Rob, If you don't mind me asking, what kind of application are you dealing with. I know it is a custom application-but, what is it for? Shawn Tooley Senior Network Engineer MCSE, MCT, CCNA, ASE, CCEA, CCSA ComputerMixx (330)264-5383 Ext:231 Pager: 3307140504@xxxxxxxxx shawn.tooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thu Sep 28 13:46:47 2006 Subject: [THIN] Re: Flash on MF XPe 1.0 Steve, That is somewhat promising news, particularly after Rick Mack's response <g>. I guess due diligence dictates that I throw up PS 4 (was that a Freudian slip?) and test the app over it. I have also implemented an evaluation of Provision Networks Provision Management Framework, so I will test over that as well. There is really not much choice in the matter; we will have to make it as painless as possible for the user as we have moved forward and re-structured our departments in support of the "new" way of doing things through the application. This came out of the demonstration of a prototype. The development team is also looking at ways they can minimize the detrimental effects of Flash. They had originally developed the app with all the bells and whistles and sliding windows and scrolling tickers and color gradations. Now that they have seen the effect on bandwidth, they are making some mods that they hope will decrease the bandwidth utilization. Thanks, rob ________________________________ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:00 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Flash on MF XPe 1.0 Rob, I believe that PS4 adds significant gains in general browser image acceleration and in Flash support over XP. I can't speak to the bandwidth differences using Flash9/Flex, this seems like an issue that Adobe would need to address. Steve Greenberg Thin Client Computing 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453 Scottsdale, AZ 85262 (602) 432-8649 www.thinclient.net steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ________________________________ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Slayden Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 12:37 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Flash on MF XPe 1.0 I have a couple of questions for the list, both relating to Flash. We are currently making development changes to our internal application that runs on Citrix through a browser (IE is what we publish) and they are coding much of it with Adobe Flex, which uses Flash 9 on the server side. During the bandwidth testing we just completed, there was a 512% increase in bandwidth utilization between the original non-flash version of the app and the updated Flash 9/Adobe Flex version of the app. Our server side is MF XPe 1.0 FR3/SP4 on Server 2003 (no SP1). The client side terminals are Wyse 3350, 3360, 3125 and S30 terminals, so we have CE 2.12 to CE.Net and ICA 6.20 through 9.04. My questions are as follows: 1. Are there any tweaks or tunes that will help Flash run better in our current environment? 2. Are the changes between XP 1.0 and PS 4.0 from a Flash perspective enough to benefit users and reduce bandwidth? Note that we would likely have to fork over about $1.5 mill to update our environment as we passed on the SA and we would also have to upgrade about half of our terminals in order to get 9.x ICA client support. Any comments, ideas, suggestions, or alternatives would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! rob IRnzjzzz ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************