[THIN] Re: Desktop
- From: Stephanie Atkinson <miitgal@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
Nice layout of the pros and cons.
Stephanie
Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: v\:*
{behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:*
{behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } I?m not sure I agree with
this? If you?re just looking to deliver an XP Themed desktop then a
conventional SBC solution is still the way to go.
Here a few reasons why companies are looking at VDI:
Simplification of workflow (a VDI desktop looks, functions and can be managed
in the same exact way (or little change) that a traditional workstation is).
SBC is traditionally a Server Team responsibility. VDI is/will become a
Desktop Team responsibility. Virtuozzo add complexity by changing the
deployment workflow tools and methodology. It also grays the area of
management responsibility. (Who manages it? Server team or Desktop). A
Virtuozzo based will require companies to hire highly skilled administrators to
implement and maintain the system. Much like they have to do with SBC
solutions.
Hypervisor based technology is easy to understand and explain
Hypervisor based technology is better overall at isolating the user?s session
and application.
Hypervisor based technology allows for multiple OS? Customers still have
Win9x\Win 2000 only apps.
Along the same lines, some application will only run on XP and not Windows
2003.
We?ve been find a lot of applications (for on reason or another) that use
kernel mode drivers. Something that Virtuozzo doesn?t deal with very well.
Virtuozzo does fit well with a SBC solution simply it allows for better
efficiencies for LMGs (Silos).
Joe
---------------------------------
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Mads Sørensen
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 10:32 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Desktop
Now we are talking VDI products, I think one of the best VDI products out
there right now is "Parallels Virtuozzo 4.0", The beauty is that it uses the
container technology on a Windows Server 2003 and with almost no overhead. So
with a Windows Server 2003 Datacenter license and the XP Theme service, you can
start as many desktops as you want or twice as many as you could with some
other VDI software on one server :-). It has a really good management
interface and I could go on. But as Rick also writes it may not be the place to
discuss this.. so I'll stop her.. but it's really worth taking a look at.
/Mads
2008/3/30, Rick Mack <ulrich.mack@xxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Steve,
I think I've pushed the bounds far enough. I've always felt that this
wasn't the forum for commercial exploits, but I couldn't resist a little dig.
Sorry.
Besides, would you really appreciate my giving you the complete spiel on
Provision Network's VAS?
Provision do have a great VDI product that's only getting better, but if
you want to find out about it contact me offline, rick.mack@xxxxxxxxx, I'll be
happy to oblige.
regards,
Rick
--
Ulrich Mack
Quest Software
Provision Networks Division
On 3/30/08, Steve Greenberg <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rick,
Tell us more about that VDI product?.!
Steve Greenberg
Wishing you a wonderful day!
Stephanie
---------------------------------
No Cost - Get a month of Blockbuster Total Access now. Sweet deal for Yahoo!
users and friends.
- References:
- [THIN] Re: Desktop
- From: Joe Shonk
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- » [THIN] Re: Desktop
- [THIN] Re: Desktop
- From: Joe Shonk