[THIN] Re: Content Redirection
- From: "Evan Mann" <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:12:51 -0500
Check this out
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;301966
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Rick Mack
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 4:11 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Content Redirection
Hi Chad,
The location of system.mdw is defined globally on the server. From
memory (don't have system with access 97 available) you're looking at
HKLM\Sofware\MIcrosoft\Office\8.0\\Access\Jet\3.5\Engines, systemdb.
Just change the systemdb value to h:\windows\system.mdw (provided h:\ is
users home drive) and add a line in usrlogon.cmd:
if not exist h:\windows\system.mdw copy %systemroot%\system32\system.mdw
<file://\\system.mdw> h:\windows
regards,
Rick
Ulrich Mack
Volante Systems
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Wednesday, 2 November 2005 2:56 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Content Redirection
Now....1 user has access open, another tries to open access
(97), issue with the C:\xxxxx\system.mdw.
I forget, what do I do with that so multi-users can use Access
on the server?
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Evan Mann
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 8:12 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Content Redirection
Good thing I opted to not install it. I have 3 users who need
it, and I would have limited them to 1 server.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:11 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Content Redirection
Issue we have found, running 5 instances of Access 97 can bury a
server.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Evan Mann
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 7:51 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Content Redirection
Efficient from the aspect of the guys who run the servers, but
from the guys who are making DB's and using Access heavily, 97 is much
quicker.
As for running 2 versions, it's easy to do when your talking
Access97. You need to install it after 2003 and then change the MDB
associates back to 2003 as you please.
I have decided not to install 97 on my servers for the 3 users
that need it, but I have the option of letting them still run it on
their desktops becaue they are fat clients.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 8:31 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Content Redirection
Thanks.
If I had a choice, it would be ONLY be Access 2003, as it is
MUCH more efficient than 97.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Wood
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 7:22 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Content Redirection
Don't think so - Server to Client is only for URLs
I suppose you could publish the content. This isn't pretty mind
- easier to live with the Access on the server.
If you're concerned about running different versions of Access
on a single box do some searches through Rick's posts - -he's described
some neat methods of getting multiple versions of access running on the
same server for users.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: 01 November 2005 13:12
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Content Redirection
I have an application that pulls MDB's. Rather than have Access
(97 is required) on the server, I would like to use content redirection
so that if an MDB is encountered, it attempts to open with the local
install of Access on the client machine. Is this possible?
________________________________
This e-mail, including all attachments, may be confidential or
privileged. Confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because
this e-mail has been sent to you in error. If you are not the intended
recipient any use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail is prohibited.
If you have received it in error please notify the sender immediately by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments.
All liability for direct and indirect loss arising from this e-mail and
any attachments is hereby disclaimed to the extent permitted by law.
________________________________
Other related posts: