Issue we have found, running 5 instances of Access 97 can bury a server. _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Evan Mann Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 7:51 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Content Redirection Efficient from the aspect of the guys who run the servers, but from the guys who are making DB's and using Access heavily, 97 is much quicker. As for running 2 versions, it's easy to do when your talking Access97. You need to install it after 2003 and then change the MDB associates back to 2003 as you please. I have decided not to install 97 on my servers for the 3 users that need it, but I have the option of letting them still run it on their desktops becaue they are fat clients. _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 8:31 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Content Redirection Thanks. If I had a choice, it would be ONLY be Access 2003, as it is MUCH more efficient than 97. _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Wood Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 7:22 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Content Redirection Don't think so - Server to Client is only for URLs I suppose you could publish the content. This isn't pretty mind - easier to live with the Access on the server. If you're concerned about running different versions of Access on a single box do some searches through Rick's posts - -he's described some neat methods of getting multiple versions of access running on the same server for users. _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M Sent: 01 November 2005 13:12 To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Content Redirection I have an application that pulls MDB's. Rather than have Access (97 is required) on the server, I would like to use content redirection so that if an MDB is encountered, it attempts to open with the local install of Access on the client machine. Is this possible?