[THIN] Re: Completely stupid shadowing question

anyone have version 1.3 of tsconsec.exe?  I can't get the 2.0.1.1 version to
work properly.  gives me a generic can't open regkey error.  And no procmon
doesn't show any access denied's or any other errors.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Um,  local administrators have permissions to shadow by default.  If your
> initiating users are not part of the local admins group then you will need
> to modify the ica-tcp permissions to allow them that capability.
>
>
>
> To script it,  you can use login consultant’s tsconsec.exe utility.
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Jeff Pitsch
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:34 AM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Completely stupid shadowing question
>
>
>
> err permissions that is
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Wasn't there some utility for scripting ICA-TCP permissions?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If they are not local administrators on the box then yes.
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Jeff Pitsch
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:06 AM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Completely stupid shadowing question
>
>
>
> Ok it's been a while since I've setup shadowing but this is a PS4.0 farm.
> The citrix policies are setup to allow help desk to shadow any explicit
> user.  The policy is at the top of the priority list for policies.  Do I
> need to give them shadow permission in the ICA-TCP properties as well?  I
> simply can't remember.....
>
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: