[THIN] Re: Citrix on VMWare
- From: Durf <stygmata@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 23:17:55 -0400
Soooo...you're saying that pig of a Visual FoxPro based app that regularly
pegs the processor and that *mumble* client of mine runs isn't going to
benefit by virtualization? o_0
Actually, I jest, partially. I am in the middle of deploying some Citrix
servers on Microsoft Virtual Server '05, but the major reason is business
continuity, not performance. The client is willing to take a tradeoff on
hardware and performance vs. recoverability and management for the following
reasons:
- System updates for the app come out fairly often, and the system needs a
rapid rollback strategy
- Client is in the middle of an acquisition phase and needs to be able to
deploy more resources quickly
- Client loves having machines that can be clones, backed up, rolled back,
and versioned according to those needs
- Client is willing to oversubscribe on hardware in order to have
scalability, reliability and redundancy
- Client is planning on having a copy of their VM image taken to a remote
datacenter for disaster recovery purposes
The basic strategy and argument for having app servers on virtual machines
is to overspend on hardware capacity by 20-40% in order to have rapid
failover, fail-back and recovery. We've demonstrated being able to roll back
to a previous version of the Virtual Hard Disk file via Volume Shadow Copy
in a case where the system becomes compromised by spyware or a bad
application update, and that has become a compelling business case for
virtualization.
On 5/9/05, Ron Oglesby <roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Well it depends.
>
> I run a one-off server build on it with low utilization right now. I
> also run my prod WI/CSG on it.
>
> Now I just did a presentation on this at Briforum and the real key is
> what your bottleneck is on Phys machines. If you run into virtual
> address space limitations on the OS but have very low Proc and mem
> utilization you probably have a real good fit. Now if you run into
> limitations of physical resources, those limitations will show up a
> little earlier in a VM environment.
>
> You have to remember the idea, the processor time is being scheduled,
> and while it is a very light overhead it is still an overhead.
> Now the next thing I can say is people running into OS limits have great
> success, People with crappy apps (Ie lots of ring 0 system calls,
> context switches etc) can experience a performance reduction. I had one
> client that with everything set per VMware recommendations and pegging
> VMs to single procs still lost 40% of their users per proc when compared
> to physical machines. This was a result of the applications being run.
>
> If you have really well behaved/written apps you can have better
> results.
>
> Now, once you get beyond those initial performance things there are
> other reasons for deploying Citrix (or any server) on VM architecture,
> but that's another thread.
>
> Ron
>
> Ron Oglesby
> Director of Technical Architecture
>
> RapidApp, Chicago
> Office: 312 372 7188
> Mobile: 815 325 7618
> email: roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of msemon@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 10:39 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Citrix on VMWare
>
> I am not sure I would put this on your primary production farm. We saw
> some
> performance issues with a client who had installed on primary production
> farm. You might look at secondary silo. Also, check out Ron's book on
> VMWare ESX server which should be in book stores any day.
>
> Mike
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Bermuda Boy phits_right@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 10:52:21 -0300
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Citrix on VMWare
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering whether anybody had performed the "daunting?" task of
> installing any of the Metaframe suite on VMWare? I was thinking of
> putting
> CSG and/or the Web Interface server in a virtualized environment.
>
> Your feed back is encouraged :-)
>
> Bermuda Boy
>
> Sean B. McLaughlin esq.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
>
> ********************************************************
> This Weeks Sponsor: ThinPrint GmbH
> Now available: The new version .print Engine 6.2 with SSL encryption
> and certificate management.
> http://www.thinprint.com
> **********************************************************
> Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> http://thin.net/links.cfm
> ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
> http://www.thinwiki.com
> ***********************************************************
> For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
> ********************************************************
> This Weeks Sponsor: ThinPrint GmbH
> Now available: The new version .print Engine 6.2 with SSL encryption
> and certificate management.
> http://www.thinprint.com
> **********************************************************
> Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> http://thin.net/links.cfm
> ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
> http://www.thinwiki.com
> ***********************************************************
> For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
>
--
--------------
Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute.
But set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Other related posts:
