[THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello XenApp Server
- From: "Mike MacDonald" <mike5287@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:40:41 -0500
Anything is better than MetaFrame XP. Management where I worked got it
confused with Windows XP and Office XP and somehow thought they were all
related no matter how many times I explained it.
The worst part is changing the server names - I use a 3 character identifier
for server type, so Citrix servers went from WFS (WinFrame Server) to MFS
(MetaFrame Server) to XPS (XP Server), then to MPS (MetaFrame Presentation
Server). The next batch will just be plain old CTX for Citrix :)
-MikeMac
On Jan 30, 2008 12:09 PM, Braebaum, Neil <Neil.Braebaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Indeed.
>
> And as much as I dislike all the form over function marketeering, it's
> not as if it's totally unexpected, is it.
>
> I mean, how many name changes had occurred before it was called
> Presentation Server?
>
> Eventually it'll come full circle, and be called Winframe ;-) (and yes,
> I'm kinda glossing over the first product they had, because it's not
> really the same...)
>
> Neil
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chad Schneider (IT)
> > Sent: 30 January 2008 17:04
> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello XenApp Server
> >
> > Citrix XenApp Server
> >
> > It is still a Citrix product.
> >
> > >>> On 1/30/2008 at 10:46 AM, <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > XenApp Server. don't forget the server, very important. We
> > wouldn't want to get it confused with a workstation or something.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Beckett, William (Bill)
> > <WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > XenApp? OMG
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jan
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:08 AM
> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello
> > XenApp Server
> >
> >
> > Why??? Citrix, read my message... this is STOOPID! Keep
> > the same name.
> >
> >
> > On Jan 29, 2008 4:27 PM, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Just curious what everyone thinks of yet
> > ANOTHER name change by Citrix of their flagship product.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> *****************************************************************************
>
> This email and its attachments are confidential and are intended for the
> above named recipient only. If this has come to you in error, please notify
> the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. You must take
> no action based on this, nor must you copy or disclose it or any part of its
> contents to any person or organisation. Statements and opinions contained in
> this email may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods Shop Direct
> Group Limited or its subsidiaries. Please note that email communications may
> be monitored. The registered office of Littlewoods Shop Direct Group Limited
> is 1st Floor, Skyways House, Speke Road, Speke, Liverpool, L70 1AB,
> registered number 5059352
>
>
> *****************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl -
> www.blackspider.com
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
>
Other related posts: