[THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello XenApp Server
- From: "Beckett, William (Bill)" <WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:36:35 -0500
Will they have a new symbol, like a guy with legs crossed and hands in
prayer form?
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chad Schneider (IT)
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:19 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello XenApp Server
I see them encompassing their virtual environments, by further expanding
the Xen name.
>>> On 1/30/2008 at 11:09 AM, <Neil.Braebaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Indeed.
And as much as I dislike all the form over function marketeering, it's
not as if it's totally unexpected, is it.
I mean, how many name changes had occurred before it was called
Presentation Server?
Eventually it'll come full circle, and be called Winframe ;-) (and yes,
I'm kinda glossing over the first product they had, because it's not
really the same...)
Neil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chad Schneider (IT)
> Sent: 30 January 2008 17:04
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello XenApp Server
>
> Citrix XenApp Server
>
> It is still a Citrix product.
>
> >>> On 1/30/2008 at 10:46 AM, <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> XenApp Server. don't forget the server, very important. We
> wouldn't want to get it confused with a workstation or something.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Beckett, William (Bill)
> <WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> XenApp? OMG
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jan
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:08 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello
> XenApp Server
>
>
> Why??? Citrix, read my message... this is STOOPID! Keep
> the same name.
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 4:27 PM, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Just curious what everyone thinks of yet
> ANOTHER name change by Citrix of their flagship product.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
************************************************************************
*****
This email and its attachments are confidential and are intended for the
above named recipient only. If this has come to you in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system.
You must take no action based on this, nor must you copy or disclose it
or any part of its contents to any person or organisation. Statements
and opinions contained in this email may not necessarily represent those
of Littlewoods Shop Direct Group Limited or its subsidiaries. Please
note that email communications may be monitored. The registered office
of Littlewoods Shop Direct Group Limited is 1st Floor, Skyways House,
Speke Road, Speke, Liverpool, L70 1AB, registered number 5059352
************************************************************************
*****
This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl -
www.blackspider.com
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
