[THIN] Re: Application Limits Not Working

  • From: Shane.Rees@xxxxxxxxxx
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 23:23:32 +1000

Hi Nagarajan - we are publishing a batch file as we need some config 
loaded up for the user before the actual executeable runs - I suspected 
that this is the problem, but was curious if this is a limitation of the 
connection limits ?

Cheers,
Shane Rees 
Senior Systems Engineer

Server Management - Network & Infrastructure Support
Mincom Managed Services 
Level 6, 193 Turbot Street, 
Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
Phone +61 (0) 7 3364 9876 
Fax +61 (0) 7 3364 9777
http://www.mincom.com 

Mincom. The People. The Experience. The Vision.

This transmission is for the intended addressee only and is confidential 
information. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
delete it and notify the sender. The contents of this e-mail are the 
opinion of the writer only and are not endorsed by the Mincom Group of 
companies unless expressly stated otherwise.



"Nagarajan Haridas" <nagarajan.haridas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
03/04/2006 11:14 PM
Please respond to
thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
<thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
[THIN] Re: Application Limits Not Working






Shane 
 
I have seen the same issue persists when we publish any batch file. Are 
you using any batch files for this purpose? Because if we have JRE on the 
server this will not occur.
 
 
Thanks
Nagarajan
 
****************************** Disclaimer ********************
The information contained and transmitted by this e-mail is proprietary to 
SLK Software Services Private Limited and is intended solely for the use 
of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized 
to receive it. It may contain privileged or confidential information or 
information exempt from disclosure as per applicable law. If you are not 
the intended recipient or responsible for delivery to the intended 
recipient, you may not copy, deliver, distribute or print this message. If 
it is a forwarded message it may not have been sent with the authority of 
the company.  Any views of  opinions are individual to the sender and are 
not the opinion of or endorsed by the company. This message and 
attachments has been virus checked. SLK Software Services Pvt. Ltd. will 
not accept any claims for loss or damages arising out of viruses.
************************* End of Disclaimer ********************

 

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Shane.Rees@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 6:27 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Application Limits Not Working
 

Hi All - I am having problems getting the "Allow only one instance of 
application for each user" option to work in our Citrix farm. Presentation 
Server 4 - running latest patch levels - Win2k3 with latest patch levels. 
The problem seems limited to published apps which run a batch file (the 
batch file generally loads some config, launches an exe and then exits). 
There are no errors/logs - it simply allows multiple instances of the 
published app to be launched.  I have tried this with and without session 
sharing enabled - same problem.   I am presuming it is because 
Presentation server cannot find an instance of the batch file in memory 
that the apps is configured to run, when the second connection is 
launched, but don't fully understand how it works.  Any help appreciated. 



Cheers, 
Shane Rees 
Senior Systems Engineer

Server Management - Network & Infrastructure Support
Mincom Managed Services 
Level 6, 193 Turbot Street, 
Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
Phone +61 (0) 7 3364 9876 
Fax +61 (0) 7 3364 9777
http://www.mincom.com 

Mincom. The People. The Experience. The Vision.

This transmission is for the intended addressee only and is confidential 
information. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
delete it and notify the sender. The contents of this e-mail are the 
opinion of the writer only and are not endorsed by the Mincom Group of 
companies unless expressly stated otherwise.

Other related posts: