[THIN] Re: Alternative fileservers (EMC Celerra)
- From: "M" <mathras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:33:02 -0000
Hello Rick,
Can you elaborate on your interesting comment.
"The Celerra style NAS approach can have throughput problems in a TS
environment. It's fine anywhere else"
I am interested because we use this (it also cost a bomb so im told) and have
had real issues with pausing Citrix sessions. Our Citrix team eventually
pinpointed this to the way the disks were configured and the way departmental
data was distributed.
Matt
----- Original Message -----
From: Rick Mack
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 11:01 AM
Subject: [THIN] Re: Alternative fileservers (EMC Celerra)
Hi Erik,
Have a look at Polyserve (HP). That is about as good as they get.
The Celerra style NAS approach can have throughput problems in a TS
environment. It's fine anywhere else.
regards,
Rick
--
Ulrich Mack
Quest Software
Provision Networks Division
On 3/26/08, Erik Blom <erik.blom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
We are currently evaluating a possible migration from our Windows 2003
fileserver towards another fileserving system. Our main concerns are security,
high-availability and performance. We talked to EMC about this and they
mentioned migrating towards a Celerra system.
Does anyone of you has any experience - good or bad - with such a system?
Regards,
Erik
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
