[THIN] Re: About to test out Threadmaster on our new app that hogs the CPU in our test lab first

I don't see why it wouldn't,  as you say it is performing a more granular 
functionality.  I personally have found you are better just leaving the 
optimizations off.  The SFO services (RTO memory stuff) runs with every user 
login. It slows logins to a crawl.  This software was originally written to be 
run..have the optimizations applied after it had reviewed the system and then 
turned off once it optimizes the dlls.  I am not sure how they modified it to 
work with Citrix.   The Aurema stuff is closer to what threadmaster does but 
without the console and ability to control what is going on it is pretty much 
useless...it is either on or off and you can't really get out of it what you 
want.   I still think that if you need these types of apps in the first place 
you should start looking at your applications and get your vendor or programmer 
to fix what is wrong with them.   (I know legacy apps..blah blah blah. )  
 
Jim Kenzig 
CEO The Kenzig Group
http://www.kenzig.com
Sponsorships Available!
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Terminal Services Downloads: http://www.thinhelp.com
Windows Vista: http://www.VistaPop.com
Virtualization: http://www.virtualize-it.com
Games: http://www.stressedpuppy.com


----- Original Message ----
From: Evan Mann <emann@>
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 12:01:14 PM
Subject: [THIN] Re: About to test out Threadmaster on our new app that hogs the 
CPU in our test lab first


CPU optimizations are off by default in PS4 (at least in a clean install).  My 
guess is a bunch of people don't even turn it on.  I know there has been alot 
of reports of issues with the memory optmizations from posters to this list, 
and I think I recalled 1 or 2 people with problesm with the CPU management as 
well.

Threadmaster is a pretty basic app when it comes down to it.  Watch for CPU to 
exceed a certain threshold and then throttle it.  It could probably run fine 
with the PS4 management.

Evan 
 



From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Joe Shonk
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 11:50 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: About to test out Threadmaster on our new app that hogs the 
CPU in our test lab first


So give up a solid, industry leading work load manager for something that does 
just thread reprioritization?  Why?
Joe

On 2/27/06, Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
Just don't enable the CPU optimization in Citrix.

 


From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Joe Shonk
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 11:15 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Subject: [THIN] Re: About to test out Threadmaster on our new app that hogs the 
CPU in our test lab first


 
Wouldn't using Threadmaster on PS4 Enterprise be like trying to run McAfee and 
Symantec AV on the same box?
 
Joe

 
On 2/27/06, Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com < jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
And if you are running CPS 4 would you not want to add the Citrix print spooler 
service? CpSvc.exe and the myriad of added CPU utililization if you are using 
it, ones like 
 
ctxcpubal.exe
ctxcpusched.exe
ctxcpuusync.exe
 
Jim Kenzig 
CEO The Kenzig Group
http://www.kenzig.com
Sponsorships Available!
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Terminal Services Downloads: http://www.thinhelp.com
Windows Vista: http://www.VistaPop.com
Virtualization: http://www.virtualize-it.com
Games: http://www.stressedpuppy.com


----- Original Message ----
From: Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 9:54:45 AM
Subject: [THIN] Re: About to test out Threadmaster on our new app that hogs the 
CPU in our test lab first 


imasrv, srvcntrol, SmaService.exe, xte, ctxxmlss ?


From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Steve Parr
Sent: 27 February 2006 14:53
To: ' thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] About to test out Threadmaster on our new app that hogs the CPU 
in our test lab first

 
The entries below are included as exceptions to the CPU throttling so that the 
system can run unencumbered and you are more or less zeroing in on the 
offending app - on a Win2k box would you include any other processes as  
exceptions?
 
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\ SYSTEM\ CurrentControlSet\ Services\ ThreadMaster\ 
Parameters\ Exceptions]
"winlogon.exe"=""
"services.exe"=""
"SPOOLSV.EXE"=""
"termsrv.exe"=""
"svchost.exe"=""
"csrss.exe"=""
"cdmsvc.exe"=""
"dfssvc.exe"=""
"llssrv.exe"=""
"lsass.exe"=""
"msdtc.exe"=""
"mstask.exe"=""
"pnsvc.exe"=""
"smss.exe"=""
"sysdown.exe"=""
"System"=""
"SystemProcess"=""
"winmgmt.exe"=""
"agentsvr.exe"=""
 
Steve Parr
Metroland Printing, Publishing and Distributing Ltd. 


 

Other related posts: