[THIN] Re: A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- From: "Dobry, Wes" <Wes.Dobry@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:06:44 -0400
Citrix won't prevent you from running other applications that can be launched
from within an application etc.
You're still running a full desktop session. Citrix just only "shows" you the
seamless application until you launch another application from within that one.
This is why you should still practice proper user lockdowns to
non-administrative users.
You can also cause a session to break out of a seamless session...
(Hint... Publish an IE page, right-click on page, view source, when notepad
opens goto file/open, right click on a folder that you create on your desktop
and click explore...)
-Wes
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Bernd Harzog
Sent: Sun 6/24/2007 7:33 AM
To: Thin List
Subject: [THIN] A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
Folks,
I have not been posting much since I left RTO a couple of years ago. I am now
with ProactiveWatch, a vendor that makes a Managed Services platform that
allows VARs to monitor and manage applications, systems and networks at their
customer sites.
We are working on putting remote control integration into a forthcoming version
of the product, and the first thing we did was RDP. The interesting case is the
case of our Console installed on a Citrix Server at the customer site. If the
Admin is using the Console (published as a Citrix app), let's say from home
(just public Internet from home to the office), and then he right-clicks and
invokes and RDP session (this assumes an RDP file on the Citrix Server with the
correct parameters), the Citrix Presentation Server turns around and publishes
that Admin an RDP session. In other words, if you have published application A,
and you launch application B from within A, Citrix goes ahead and just
publishes B to you in your existing session. All of this without any work on
the back end to "enable" RDP as a Citrix application.
Now this is tremendously convenient for an Admin because you can basically
right-click and have a desktop to any server you want to see without actually
have to publish MSTSC as an application. But if (and I am not sure this is
true), you are a user running published Word, and then go run a script to
launch Notepad, then you can write things to the file system that will
eventually turn the server over to you.
So, is this working the way it is supposed to, and if so, is this a good thing
or a really big security hole.
I look forward to comments from all of my old friends (Rick, Jim, are you
listening).
Cheers,
Bernd Harzog
Vice President and General Manager
ProactiveWatch
www.proactivewatch.com
bharzog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
770-475-4249
This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, any review, use, or distribution of this e-mail message and any
attached files is strictly prohibited. This communication may contain material
protected by Federal privacy regulations, attorney-client work product, or
other privileges. If you have received this confidential communication in
error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail message and
permanently delete the original message. To reply to our email administrator
directly, send an email to: postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx . If this e-mail
message concerns a contract matter, be advised that no employee or agent is
authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Orlando Regional
Healthcare by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of the
corporation. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Orlando Regional
Healthcare.
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- From: Jim Kenzig ThinHelp.com
- References:
- [THIN] A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- From: Bernd Harzog
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- » [THIN] A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- » [THIN] Re: A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- » [THIN] Re: A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- » [THIN] Re: A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- » [THIN] Re: A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- [THIN] Re: A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- From: Jim Kenzig ThinHelp.com
- [THIN] A Great Citrix Feature or a Massive Security Hole?
- From: Bernd Harzog