on the other hand, what would happen if you just made a copy of the folder in question in the "program files" folder. I know that Microsoft is trying to keep things separate but it is just an organizational structure isn't it. On 3/15/07, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree, I don't think it is going to like it either but it would take two seconds to try and who knows, you might get lucky. I wonder how it would work out as a streamed application. Make the profile on a 32 bit server then stream it to the 64, kind of ugly but maybe... On 3/15/07, Landin, Mark <Mark.Landin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't think that's going to act like a "redirection" of a directory > in one directory tree to the same directory in another directory tree like > Chad is needing. That's more like the UNIX concept of a file link, where a > given directory or file object can be referenced by multiple names. To my > knowledge, shortcuts do not provide that kind of functionality. The closest > kind of functionality that I can think of is the old DOS SUBST command, and > that too isn't going to apply to this situation. > > MS really caused headaches when they split up their own naming > conventions (for both file systems AND the registry) to have seperate but > parallel locations for 32-bit vs 64-bit software. I kind of understand why > they did it, but cannot accept that this was their best option! I know a lot > of other systems (say, HP-UX, which is what I have experience with) that > doesn't expose the user to the difference between a 32-bit and 64-bit > executable. The 800-lb gorilla, wihere Microsoft's interests and priorities > trump those of their customers, strikes again. > > Obviously, the application is at fault as well for hard-coding path > names, but MS very likely had the ability to shield us from these kinds of > problems ... they just chose not to. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Greg Reese > *Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:00 AM > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: 64-bit 2003/Citrix w/SAP > > > what happens if you put a shortcut in "program files" that points to > the location in "program files (x86)" that you need? > > Greg > > > On 3/15/07, Schneider, Chad M <CMSchneider@xxxxxxxxx > wrote: > > > > WE have SAP GUI running on 64-bit W2K3 and 64-bit Citrix PS 4.5. > > Works great. > > > > > > > > What is not working is the BEX portion of SAP. It appears to have a > > hard coded path to the "c:\program files" install path, yet when installed > > on a 64-bit server, it installs to "c:\program files (x86)". > > > > > > > > Any idea how to change BEX to use the proper path? > > > > > > > > Chad Schneider > > > > Technology Analyst/Citrix Admin. > > > > Bemis Company, Inc. > > > > 920-303-7609 > > > > > > > >