Alex is correct. Citrix did a presentation on this at iForum last year. It was very interesting. Jeff On 7/27/05, Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hmm, that sounds interesting. I'm forcing many of my apps to 256 color > because there is simply no need for anything more, and that's what they > were used to on 2000 TS anyway. Based on this, I should run them all at > 16bit anyway, because 'll save cpu overhead and have very little impact > on bandwidth? > > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Alexander Danilychev > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:17 PM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: 16-bit color vs. 24-bit color > > This is due to the overhead of down sampling 16-bit to 256 colors when > running at low color, i.e. Citrix (as far as I know) recommends 16-bit > versus 256 colors due to better performance on the server and > insignificant difference with the bandwidth. However 24-bit WILL impact > your bandwidth. > > ALEX > www.ishadow.com > > >From: "Steve Greenberg" <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Reply-To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: [THIN] Re: 16-bit color vs. 24-bit color > >Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:31:14 -0700 > > > >We have been told repeatedly by Citrix that there is essentially no > >greater bandwidth used for higher color depth. While I find this hard > >to understand, reliable sources have confirmed it. > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > > > >Steve Greenberg > > > >Thin Client Computing > > > >34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453 > > > >Scottsdale, AZ 85262 > > > >(602) 432-8649 > > > >www.thinclient.net > > > >steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > _____ > > > >From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > >Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M > >Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:41 PM > >To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: [THIN] 16-bit color vs. 24-bit color > > > > > > > >How much more bandwidth is consumed running 24-bit color, than 16-bit > >color, in general, I know it would depend on how many graphics were > >involved. > > > >M$ W2K3 > >CTX PS 4.0 > >9.0 PN Agent > > > >Chad > > > > > ******************************************************** > This weeks sponsor: SuperSpeed > Try Us To improve performance along with other agents! > FREE 30-day Trial! > http://www.superspeed.com/servers/computing.php?ID=100 > ********************************************************** > Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: > http://thin.net/links.cfm > ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! > http://www.thinwiki.com > *********************************************************** > For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode > use the below link: > http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm > ******************************************************** > This weeks sponsor: SuperSpeed > Try Us To improve performance along with other agents! > FREE 30-day Trial! > http://www.superspeed.com/servers/computing.php?ID0 > ********************************************************** > Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: > http://thin.net/links.cfm > ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! > http://www.thinwiki.com > *********************************************************** > For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm > ******************************************************** This weeks sponsor: SuperSpeed Try Us To improve performance along with other agents! FREE 30-day Trial! http://www.superspeed.com/servers/computing.php?ID0 ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! http://www.thinwiki.com *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm