Re: part rant (implied) part request for help - Win95 to Win98

  • From: Hunter <hunters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: technocracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 16 Aug 100 12:18:24 -0500 (EST)

> Ignoring anything other than technical issues and Microsoft's lame
> advice (see actual quote below), I need practical advice on what to
> consider as a realistic limit on the configuration and hardware of
> computers that will be upgraded from Windows95 to Windows98. Ignoring
> Microsoft's lower limit of a 486/66 with 24 MB of RAM, what do any of
> you think I should set as a lower limit for hardware?

A PII or equivilant at at least 233MHz, and no less than 64MB RAM.

> documents as well as Internet Explorer bookmarks, your address book, and
> e-mail messages. If you have files that are too large to fit on floppy

Aggghhh!! Email attatchments are evil! What the heck is FTP for, eh?

-- 
Steven Hunter  | hunters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Hyrdoplaning towards infinity... Just some drag-queens and, me." - Olly

Other related posts:

  • » Re: part rant (implied) part request for help - Win95 to Win98